Building a Health History
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON Building a Health History
Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.
This is my patient: 76-year-old black male with disabilities living in an urban setting
This it the risk assessment instrument- POMR (Problem-Oriented Medical Record)
1. Comprehensive health history
2. Complete physical examination
3. Problem list
4. Assessment and plan
5. Baseline and problem-directed laboratory and radiologic imaging studies
6. Progress notes
APA format- 3 sources cited. Interview style, relevant questions pertaining to the patient.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric Grid View Main Posting List View Excellent Good Fair Poor 45 (45%) – 50 40 (40%) – 44 35 (35%) – 39 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) “Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are super”cially addressed. Is somewhat lacking re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains “Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or super”cially addresses criteria. Building a Health History
Lacks re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. (50%) “Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with re!ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. (44%) “Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is re!ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. (39%) some APA formatting errors. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. Building a Health History
First Response Second Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A N/A Does not post main post by Day 3. 15 (15%) – 16 13 (13%) – 14 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) (16%) (14%) “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. “Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. “Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. “Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 16 (16%) – 17 14 (14%) – 15 12 (12%) – 13 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) “Response is on topic and may have some “Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. (17%) “Response exhibits synthesis, (15%) “Response exhibits critical thinking and (13%) Participation critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Building a Health History
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. N/A N/A Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric EXIT … Building a Health History