Task: Care Coordination Plan

Task: Care Coordination Plan

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON  Task: Care Coordination Plan

Assessment 4 Instructions: Care Coordination Plan

  • For this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.

    DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.
      • Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.
    • Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.
      • Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.
    • Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.
      • Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2020 document.
    • Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing.
      • Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.
    • Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care.
      • Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.
    • Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.
      • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
      • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Task: Care Coordination Plan

    PREPARATION

    In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and discuss how the plan includes elements of Healthy People 2020.Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your plan to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback. Task: Care Coordination Plan

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.For this assessment:

    • Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.
    Document Format and Length

    Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA formatted paper, 5–7 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.

    Supporting Evidence

    Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2020 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.

    Grading Requirements

    The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

    • Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.
      • Address three health care issues.
      • Design an intervention for each health issue. Task: Care Coordination Plan
      • Identify three community resources for each health intervention.
    • Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.
      • Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.
      • Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.
    • Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.
      • Cite specific health policy provisions.
    • Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.
      • Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan.
    • Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2020 document.
      • Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.
      • Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2020 document.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

 

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Forsaken Memorial Health System (evaluating the governance system) You’ve taken a position with a consulting company. You are trying to act like you are worth what the company pays you and maybe even what they bill the client for your work. Your firm’s engagement is to develop an evaluation of Forsaken Memorial Health System (FMH), a hospital trying to become a healthcare system. FMH is one of two hospitals serving a community of 300,000 in the Midwest. FMH wants to remain independent, but its record to date on strategy, planning, cost control, and even quality is only mediocre. The partner at your consulting company asks you to develop a list of questions or topics the firm must review about the governing board and the CEO. He says: Put down everything we ought to check using interviews, bylaws, and minutes, in a way that we can organize a final report. This includes membership, relation to community, and ability to handle issues. Don’t forget the possibility that we may have to tell FMH to find a strong partner, but if we do that we’ll need to have a convincing justification. I think we’ll list what they need in the way of capabilities, show what they’ve got, and let them wrestle with the gap. Task: Care Coordination Plan
The ‘needs’ must be convincing—if they look too cookbook, the client won’t believe them, and our rapport with them will be lost. The list I’m asking you to prepare isn’t Mickey Mouse, so include a justification for the questions. You might want to summarize the questions on a one-page table. The justification should be four pages or less. “Would it be smart to use the Well-Managed Health Care Organization as a guide?” you ask. “I guess so,” he replies. “It’s a well-regarded text, but remember this place is accredited. It meets the basics. No sense in asking, ‘Do they appoint a CEO?’ because it’s obvious. Focus in on the critical questions, the ones that are likely to make a difference. Like, ‘Is the executive staff prepared for the challenges ahead?’ or ‘Do they have a board and CEO evaluation system that keeps them competitive?’ “Also,” he says, “textbooks aren’t very dynamic. If this place is going to make it, it will have to have its share of support from the community movers and shakers, including the medical staff leadership. We might think about who the heavy hitters are in the community, what they are thinking about, and how well the FMH board is linked in to that thinking.” … Task: Care Coordination Plan