Reflection paper in nursing.

CNA340 Pre-requisites for person-centred care: Reflective paper

Assessment Criteria HD DN CR PP NN

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the relationship between identified pre-requisite and its importance in person-centred nursing care. 40%

Demonstrates a high-level of application of person- centred care, that accurately and comprehensively explains the students’ understanding of the of the process and how this relates to the chosen pre- requisite/standards for practice

Accurate application of knowledge of person- centred care that indicates a high-level understanding of its relationship to chosen pre-requisite and the standards for practice.

Mostly accurate application of knowledge of person- centred care. Reasonable exploration of its relationship to the chosen pre-requisite and the standards for practice. Scope for more depth.

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Mostly accurate application of knowledge of person- centred care. Reasonable exploration of its relationship to the chosen pre-requisite. No clear links to standards for practice provided. Scope for more depth.

Provides insufficient and/or confused knowledge that does not clearly demonstrate an understanding of person- centred care, its relationship to the pre- requisite chosen and/or to the standards for practice.

Demonstrates the ability to reflect on own professional practice and professional identify to inform future nursing practice 40%

Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of reflective practice that details clear, relevant future nursing practice considerations in the context of the pre- requisite discussed.

Demonstrates a strong understanding of the application reflective practice to future nursing practice with sound description of future nursing practice considerations that are in context to the pre-requisite discussed.

Demonstrates a satisfactory approach to reflective practice that details some considerations for future nursing practice but with scope for additional detail. Satisfactory alignment with the pre- requisite discussed.

Demonstrates elements for reflective practice with some considerations for future practice explored. However, scope for more depth and/or alignment with the pre-requisite discussed.

Demonstrates a poor understanding of the application of reflective practice and considerations for future practice And/or reflections provided do not clearly link with the pre-requisite discussed.

Uses appropriate scholarly literature to substantiate findings throughout. Uses Harvard referencing style. 10%

Accurately references all sources using the Harvard style. Outstanding use of appropriate academic literature that substantiates thinking and arguments that considers evidence-based practice relevant to the case.

Accurately references the majority of sources using the Harvard style. Uses scholarly literature and expands upon key points of discussion that include evidence-based practice.

Accurately references the majority of sources using the Harvard style. Uses some relevant scholarly literature, but scope to expand further.

Draws upon some scholarly literature to substantiate discussion, but scope to consider additional evidence. Errors evident in referencing style.

Inaccurate and/or inconsistent referencing style. No or minimal use of appropriate scholarly literature to substantiate findings.

Writes in a clear and concise academic style that is succinct, logical and coherent. 10%

Communicates with a highly evolved academic writing style with strong evidence of planning. The paper is exceptionally logical, insightful and balanced and is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner with minimal or no spelling/grammar errors.

Communicates with a strong academic writing style with clear evidence of planning, and presented in a logical and fluent manner.

Minimal spelling/grammar errors.

Communicates with a mostly academic writing style with some evidence of planning. Generally expressed in a clear and fluent manner.

Evidence of spelling/grammar errors that impact on flow of paper.

Reflection paper in nursing.

Communicates with a basic writing style that is reasonably coherent and clear but has scope for improvement in line with academic convention. Errors in spelling/grammar impact on flow of paper.

Not presented in an academic manner. Multiple spelling/grammar errors which significantly impact on readability.