Rhetorical Analysis of CDC ADHD Website Paper

Earnest Dixon, Jr ENG 105-0504 July 24, 2019 Prof. Virgil Mathes Rhetorical Analysis of CDC Website From a closer look on the site, the writer has a clear and well-outlined topic that they want to address. There are different aspects that the website tries to address including the sign and symptoms, types, causes, diagnosis, treatment, managing symptoms, and ADHD in adults. Lastly, the website gives the outline on how one can get help in case they discover such a condition on their children. To begin, the choice of the topic is excellent since it has a specific focus on its audience. The target audience are the parent and healthcare practitioners who deal mostly with children. The public to some extent are touched by the information in the website since they also need to take care of themselves in case they see such signs. The context of the issues majors on ADHD, which is a neurodevelopment disorder in children. The writer has a clear introduction of the topic and cares to include the essence of the topic in the first paragraph (Foss, 2017). However, there is some important information that the writer does not include. I believe that when he says about the dominant infection among the children, it would be best if they had certain figures to support the claim. He goes directly to define the possible consequences even without having to introduce the topic with a stronger claim. RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF CDC WEBSITE 2 The writer is the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and therefore must be credible when it comes to matters health. There is a lot of information that CDC knows and therefore they are the best to talk about ADHD. Through the writing, they have an effective interaction feature with the information (Krippendorff, 2018). Its an indication that the writer has knowledge on the topic. To define whether a writer is credible, there is the need to analyze how well they outline the information and what they borrow from. Though they do not give a clear statistic on the number of infections per year, they are confident to say that the rate of infection is increasing. That gives us the reason as to why the writer wanted to handle the article and talk about ADHD. The background of the writer is known, as they have been in operation in the healthcare sector for many years. The writer operates under the health ministry in the United States and therefore the best to address such a topic. The choice of words matches the intended audience. The writer is sure that the audience has a close interaction with children and, therefore, uses words that are easy to understand and relate when handling a child. It’s evident that the writer has a clear knowledge about the topic from the way he integrates the format and the outlining. The writer has certain beliefs like where they claim that ADHD is best treated with a combination of behavior therapy and medication (Foss, 2017). The belief is seen to be out of the experience and knowledge the writer have when dealing with such patients. The source therefore can be termed as credible and reliable. The choice of language by the writer is in line with the intended audience. Rhetorical Analysis of CDC ADHD Website Paper

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

The choice of words is also connected to the issues affecting children and therefore the audience will easily relate. The writer employs ethos whereby he at first develops trustworthiness and reputation with the audience (Krippendorff, 2018). Any audience who sees the writer will believe that they provide credible information. Remember that the writer if under the ministry of health and RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF CDC WEBSITE therefore knowledgeable about ADHD. Pathos is also effectively developed whereby the writer knows how well to draw the emotions of the audience. By describing how severe the infectious disease is without doubt will catch the emotions of the audience. Most of them are parents and therefore they do not want their children to suffer from such an infectious disease and will therefore be prompted to act. Lastly, logos is implemented whereby the writer brings reasoning to convince the audience (Foss, 2017). When the writer talks about ADHD affecting the person even when they are adults, that enough reason to convince the audience to take action. The writer`s choice of word is also effective since the phrases used are familiar with the audience. Though the writer uses specialized terms, they can easily be connected to what they want to mean. From the analysis, it’s clear that the writer was effective when delivering the message though they were not perfect. I believe that one should base their argument from a statistical point of view compared to just assuming the extent to which a situation is. 3 RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF CDC WEBSITE References Foss, S. K. (2017). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html 4 Running head: DISCUSSION QUERY 1 Discussion Query Name of Student Institution Affiliation DISCUSSION QUERY 2 Discussion Query The above image from one of the CDC website pages on ADHD is the most persuasive and powerful. The depiction of the intended audience is one of the aspects that harness the persuasiveness and powerfulness of the image. For example, the involvement of a child and the bear doll in the image shows that the target audiences are the children. Additionally, the provision of the intended purpose of the image precisely the treatment of children also facilitates the persuasiveness and powerfulness of the image.Rhetorical Analysis of CDC ADHD Website Paper

The involvement of a healthcare professional and a child in the image conveys that children deserve medical attention for all their illnesses. Moreover, the picture also depicts the effectiveness of harnessing a rapport with the children as the basic step for the provision of medical services to the children. This undertaking is envisioned on the image through the use of the bear doll as a means to interact with the child. DISCUSSION QUERY 3 Reference Cdc.gov. (2019, April 19). Research on ADHD. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/research.html 1 Earnest Dixon, Jr ENG 105-0504 July 24, 2019 Prof. Virgil Mathes Rhetorical Analysis of CDC Website From a closer look on the site, the writer has a clear and well-outlined topic that they want to address. There are different aspects that the website tries to address including the sign and symptoms, types, causes, diagnosis, treatment, managing symptoms, and ADHD in adults. Lastly, the website gives the outline on how one can get help in case they discover such a condition on their children. To begin, the choice of the topic is excellent since it has a specific focus on its audience. The target audience are the parent and healthcare practitioners who deal mostly with children. The public to some extent are touched by the information in the website since they also need to take care of themselves in case they see such signs. The context of the issues majors on ADHD, which is a neurodevelopment disorder in children. The writer has a clear introduction of the topic and cares to include the essence of the topic in the first paragraph (Foss, 2017). However, there is some important information that the writer does not include. I believe that when he says about the dominant infection among the children, it would be best if they had certain figures to support the claim. He goes directly to define the possible consequences even without having to introduce the topic with a stronger claim. RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF CDC WEBSITE 2 The writer is the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and therefore must be credible when it comes to matters health. There is a lot of information that CDC knows and therefore they are the best to talk about ADHD. Through the writing, they have an effective interaction feature with the information (Krippendorff, 2018). Its an indication that the writer has knowledge on the topic. To define whether a writer is credible, there is the need to analyze how well they outline the information and what they borrow from. Rhetorical Analysis of CDC ADHD Website Paper

Though they do not give a clear statistic on the number of infections per year, they are confident to say that the rate of infection is increasing. That gives us the reason as to why the writer wanted to handle the article and talk about ADHD. The background of the writer is known, as they have been in operation in the healthcare sector for many years. The writer operates under the health ministry in the United States and therefore the best to address such a topic. The choice of words matches the intended audience. The writer is sure that the audience has a close interaction with children and, therefore, uses words that are easy to understand and relate when handling a child. It’s evident that the writer has a clear knowledge about the topic from the way he integrates the format and the outlining. The writer has certain beliefs like where they claim that ADHD is best treated with a combination of behavior therapy and medication (Foss, 2017). The belief is seen to be out of the experience and knowledge the writer have when dealing with such patients. The source therefore can be termed as credible and reliable. The choice of language by the writer is in line with the intended audience. The choice of words is also connected to the issues affecting children and therefore the audience will easily relate. The writer employs ethos whereby he at first develops trustworthiness and reputation with the audience (Krippendorff, 2018). Any audience who sees the writer will believe that they provide credible information. Remember that the writer if under the ministry of health and RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF CDC WEBSITE therefore knowledgeable about ADHD. Pathos is also effectively developed whereby the writer knows how well to draw the emotions of the audience. By describing how severe the infectious disease is without doubt will catch the emotions of the audience. Most of them are parents and therefore they do not want their children to suffer from such an infectious disease and will therefore be prompted to act. Lastly, logos is implemented whereby the writer brings reasoning to convince the audience (Foss, 2017). When the writer talks about ADHD affecting the person even when they are adults, that enough reason to convince the audience to take action. The writer`s choice of word is also effective since the phrases used are familiar with the audience. Rhetorical Analysis of CDC ADHD Website Paper

Though the writer uses specialized terms, they can easily be connected to what they want to mean. From the analysis, it’s clear that the writer was effective when delivering the message though they were not perfect. I believe that one should base their argument from a statistical point of view compared to just assuming the extent to which a situation is. 767 3 RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF CDC WEBSITE References Foss, S. K. (2017). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html Cite the CDC’s ADHD page here too 4 Checklist for the Rhetorical Analysis  Does the essay focus on rhetorical analysis of this public document rather than simply summarizing the information?  Are the three appeals, ethos, pathos, and logos, discussed?  Is there a thesis placed at the end of the introduction that makes a distinct claim and has three clear subtopics?  Does the essay meet the requirements of 750-1000 words of text? (This does not include the reference page or the heading.)  Does the essay flow in a logical order?  Is the essay written in GCU style, per the template and formatting guide?  Are there two outside sources with corresponding in-text citations?  Are the sources used in the essay scholarly, and is the public document (the CDC) being cited as well?  Is the writing academic, formal, and written in third person point of view?  Were words written out (not abbreviated/contractions avoided) and the essay proofread carefully for punctuation and grammar errors? Rhetorical Analysis of CDC ADHD Website Paper