Nursing Diversity Discussion

Nursing Diversity Discussion

This week you will examine how to be a patient advocate for all individuals, particularly those who are from a different culture than your own.

  1. First, consider an ethical dilemma that you have encountered in your own nursing practice—choose one that was caused by a misunderstanding between people from different cultures. Describe that situation clearly.
  2. How did each group or individual perceive the dilemma? (Present both sides, objectively.)
  3. Identify the conflicting values and belief systems held by each group.
  4. What data was missing—what information did the health care providers not have about the patient’s culture?
  5. Next, define culturally congruent care.

References

Minimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)

4 peer review no more the 5

Textbooks:

Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care, Joyceen S. Boyle & Margaret M. Andrews. (2015), 7th edition

Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMedor CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.

Style

Unless otherwise specified, all the written assignment must follow APA 6th edition formatting, citations and references. Click hereto download the Microsoft Word APA 6th edition template. Make sure you cross-reference the APA 6th edition book as well before submitting the assignment.

Number of Pages/Words

Unless otherwise specified all papers should have a minimum of 600 words (approximately 2.5 pages) excluding the title and reference pages.

Introduction and conclusion include

 

Unformatted Attachment Preview

! $ % 1 of 1 NRSE 4570 RUBRIC: M5 A10 WA: ADVOCACY AND ITS ROLE IN CULTURAL DIVERSITY (40 pts) Criteria Introduction Key Requirement 1 Key Requirement 2 Body Key Requirement 3 Key Requirement 4 Conclusion Accomplished 7 to 7 Points Clearly states the purpose of the paper. Provides a comprehensive overview of topic or questions. Engages the reader. Organized and has easy follow. 4 to 4 Points First, consider an ethical dilemma that you have encountered in your own nursing practice – choose one that was caused by a misunderstanding between people from different cultures. Describe that situation clearly. 6 to 6 Points How did each group or individual perceive the dilemma? (Present both sides, objectively.) Identify the conflicting values and belief systems that were held by each side. 5 to 5 Points What data was missing – what information did the health care providers not have about the patient’s culture? 5 to 5 Points Next, define culturally congruent care. Nursing Diversity Discussion
What culturally congruent strategies do you recommend? 7 to 7 Points Summarizes paper and reflects on what the reader has learned from the paper. Demonstrates persuasive thought and is well organized. Last updated: 06/07/2017 Levels of Achievement Needs Improvement 2 to 6 Points Overview is provided, but key points/ideas are missing. Purpose statement is not clear. Does not engage the reader. Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible 2 to 3 Points Ethical dilemma not fully discussed. M issing discussion of the entire situation. 3 to 5 Points Discussed both sides briefly. M ay be missing objectivity or full details. Did not discuss conflicting values and belief systems. 3 to 4 Points Partial discussion of what misunderstanding was taking place. D id not demonstrate evidence of critical thinking on this requirement. 3 to 4 Points Defined culturally congruent care. Needed more detail and evidence of critical thinking in terms of culturally congruent strategies to apply. 2 to 6 Points Merely summarizes the introduction or contains new ideas not present in the paper contents. Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible. Not Acceptable 0 to 1 Points Does not provide an overview of the paper or is absent. No purpose statement. 0 to 1 Points Writing is disorganized. D ifficult to follow the writer’s train of thought. 0 to 2 Points Writing is disorganized and difficult to follow. 0 to 2 Points Writing is disorganized. D ifficult to follow the writer’s train of thought. 0 to 2 Points Writing is disorganized. D ifficult to follow the writer’s train of thought. 0 to 1 Points Simply restates the i ntroduction or is absent. Disorganized to the point of distraction. © 2017 School of Nursing – Ohio University Page 1 of 2 NRSE 4570 RUBRIC: M5 A10 WA: ADVOCACY AND ITS ROLE IN CULTURAL DIVERSITY (40 pts) Criteria Stylistics Accomplished 6 to 6 Points APA Citations are appropriate. Formatted correctly. Reference page is complete and correctly formatted. At least 4 references provided: Two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. *References not older than five years. More than 600 words excluding title and reference pages. Levels of Achievement Needs Improvement 3 to 5 Points APA Citations are appropriate and formatted correctly. Nursing Diversity Discussion
Reference page is formatted correctly. References are not professional or is not formatted correctly. Missing 1 professional reference. At least 600 words or more excluding title and reference pages. Not Acceptable 0 to 2 Points No citations are used or citations are made but not formatted correctly Reference page is missing. Less than 600 words excluding title and reference pages. Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc. –), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs – National Guideline Clearinghouse). References not acceptable (not inclusive) are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases. *All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information) Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret SafeAssign originality report. ! ” 1 of 2 ! ! # … Nursing Diversity Discussion