Advanced Practice Module 3 Discussion.
Advanced Practice Module 3 Discussion.
Advanced Practice Module 3 Discussion
Included in an Introductory Paragraph of Research Papers
The introductory paragraph of a research paper is the first impression for the writer to present a topic and get the reader interested. It is necessary to provide a background with a summary of existing research. The research problem should be explicitly detailed, and the author should give a position on their approach. The introduction should also provide an overview of the structure of the paper. It is a crucial component of the opening of the topic, and it should be presented how the subject is exciting and essential. It can be accomplished with a sentence that is considered a strong opening hook. A striking opening sentence will help the reader understand the relevance of the topic.
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Select an Introduction from Scholarly Research Article
Clinician burnout is recognized by feelings of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment.1 Nearly 35% of nurses are burnt-out,2 and 58.2% of hematology/oncology nurse practitioners (NPs) experience moderate to high emotional exhaustion, a component of burnout. Given the high prevalence of burnout and the negative consequences (e.g., lower provider productivity, lower patient satisfaction, poor self-care, and provider turnover) resulting from burnout, researchers have classified burnout as a public health crisis (Abraham et al., 2021).
An Appraisal from a Research Article Example
The article does provide a strong statement that reflects the research area in the form of a hook sentence. The author did target what they are aiming to show and how the perspective is essential and applicable to the work of advanced practice nurses. The author’s position on their approach is not completely clear in telling the reader about the research it plans to conduct, and I found the explanation vague and not specific enough.
To date, researchers have found that a poor practice environment within the health care setting is a predictor of clinician burnout (Abraham et al., 2021).
It is not clear about the aim of the study, and an overview of the paper’s structure was unclear. Although further reading beyond the introduction did convey the conceptual framework regarding how the researcher plans to conduct necessary elements of evaluating the topic, it was not found within the opening.
The introduction does provide more useful and highly relevant information. In a meta-analysis, hospital nurses in favorable work environments, characterized by adequate staffing and resources, collegial relations between nurses, physicians, and administrators, and visibility of nurses on important committees, had 26% lower odds of burnout, thus indicating that the environment where nurses deliver patient care can influence burnout. I found the specific information regarding the topic to be relevant.
How PICOT helps form a Clinical Question
The PICOT format systematically breaks down a research question into various components that will give rise to the understanding of a concept for research. The PICOT format enables researchers not to provide a paper that has missing information. Simply put, the PICOT question helps the author give a question and determine the best process for finding the answers.
Discuss Population, Intervention, Comparison Intervention, and Outcome
A research question is the central theme of a scientific experiment around which everything revolves (Nundy et al., 2021). The word PICOT is a highly used mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical question representing patient, intervention, comparison intervention, and outcome.
The P in PICOT depicts the population or the disease. It can be about a particular disorder, age, ethnicity, or gender. It is a problem for the research question. I for intervention is related to the variable of interest, meaning prognostic factors like risky behavior or exposure to a disease. C is the comparison or control of what other interventions should be considered. An example of comparison could be an absence of a risk or a disease. O is the desired or expected outcome of the objective, for example, the rate of occurrence of an adverse effect or the accuracy of a diagnosis. T for time relates to the time it takes to demonstrate an outcome. How long were the participants observed, or how long did it take to reach the desired result.
How the PICOT Process Helps Arrive at a Quality Clinical Question
The PICOT process enables the formation of a relatively straightforward and appropriate language to arrive at a quality clinical question for evidence-based medicine. It deconstructs an intricate process that compartmentalizes necessary steps to enable students to streamline proper, essential, and quality clinical questions that cover all the critical elements required for addressing clinical questions.
References
Abraham, C. M., Zheng, K., Norful, A. A., Ghaffari, A., Liu, J., & Poghosyan, L. (2021). Primary care practice environment and burnout among nurse practitioners. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 17(2), 157–162. Retrieved July 11, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.11.009 (Links to an external site.)
Nundy, S., Kakar, A., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2021). How to Think of a Research Question? How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries, 65–69. Retrieved July 11, 2022, from https://doi.org/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-5248-6_7