Assignment: Theory Evaluation Paper.

Assignment: Theory Evaluation Paper.

Assignment: Theory Evaluation Paper.

 

Unit 4 Assignment: Theory Evaluation Paper Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
20 pts

Level 5

Provides a compelling and insightful introduction using a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement that clearly introduces the topics to be discussed.

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

17.5 pts

Level 4

Provides a clear introduction using a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement that is general in detail.

15 pts

Level 3

Provides an introduction with general information and/or unclear problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement.

12.5 pts

Level 2

Provides an introduction with limited information and/or unclear or absent problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement.

10 pts

Level 1

Introduction is unclear and does not provide a defined problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement.

0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of an introduction and does not provide a defined problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement.

 

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

NU500-CO2; NU500-CO3; NU500-CO4; NU500-CO6

25 pts

Level 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.

22.5 pts

Level 4

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.

20 pts

Level 3

Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.

17.5 pts

Level 2

Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.

15 pts

Level 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.

0 pts

Level 0

Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.

 

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

NU500-CO2; NU500-CO3; NU500-CO4; NU500-CO6

50 pts

Level 5

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

45 pts

Level 4

Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

40 pts

Level 3

Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

35 pts

Level 2

Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.

30 pts

Level 1

Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

0 pts

Level 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

 

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
50 pts

Level 5

All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

45 pts

Level 4

Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

40 pts

Level 3

Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

35 pts

Level 2

Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

30 pts

Level 1

Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.

0 pts

Level 0

The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.

 

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

NU500-CO2; NU500-CO3; NU500-CO4; NU500-CO6

75 pts

Level 5

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

67.5 pts

Level 4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

60 pts

Level 3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

52.5 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

45 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 

75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
20 pts

Level 5

States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.

17.5 pts

Level 4

States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.

15 pts

Level 3

States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.

12.5 pts

Level 2

States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

10 pts

Level 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.

0 pts

Level 0

States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.

 

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

PRICE-P

30 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

27 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

24 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

21 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

18 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

 

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-I

10 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

7 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

6 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.