China Cancer Medical Therapy Paper.

Assessment Brief Instructions for Assignment. Your written report should be in the form of an essay (max 2500 word +/- 10%) with the title “CD19 as a target for cancer therapy”. Important note: You may find useful information in your lectures for this module, however you must cite the primary reference sources for this information and not the lecture. Your report must show critical evaluation of relevant published data, and demonstrate an awareness of both strengths and limitations associated with CD19 as a target for therapy. Guidance on the Report Structure.

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Your report should contain a title page providing the assignment name, module number and name, your candidate number (not your name), and the word count of your report (excluding reference list). Your report can be structured as you wish with sub-headings of your choice. Figures may be used if desired. If a figure is included, it must be numbered, contain an appropriate figure legend, and should be referred to within the main text of your report. Look at published scientific papers for examples of how figures should be formatted. Your report should contain a reference list at the end, which lists all the reference sources you have cited, using a Harvard style format as shown below. General Information About Report Format. x The report needs to be type written. x The report should be written in Arial 11 point or Calibri 11 point font with 1.5 line spacing. Microsoft default page margins (2.54 cm for each edge) is recommended. All pages must be numbered. Text in the report should not be split into multiple columns.

x The word count should be not more than 2500 words +/- 10%, excluding the reference list. A word count for the main body of the text must be included on the front page. Format of citation in main text. For one author: (Rooney, 1998). For two authors: (Rooney & Cole, 2001). 2 Assessment Brief For three or more authors: (Rooney et al., 2010). For more than one citation at one point within the text, by year of publication: Previous data shows the sport gene is a transmembrane protein (Hou et al., 2005; Johne et al., 2005; Johne et al., 2006; Allander et al., 2007; Gaynor et al., 2007). For more than one citation by the same author in the same year: (Jones & Smith, 2003a; Jones & Smith, 2003b). Format of full reference in the reference section. Referencing a journal article: Rooney W, Cole AS, Gerrard S, Lampard F, and Capello F. “Tactics to ensure that you will not win the World Cup” International Journal of Sporting Failures, 2010; vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 23-29. Referencing a book chapter: Cole, C. N. & Conzen, S. D. (2001). Polyomaviridae: the viruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, pp. 2141–2174. Edited by D.

M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, D. E. Griffin, R. A. Lamb, M. A. Martin, B. Roizman & S. E. Straus. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 3 Grading Rubric Assessment Criteria Critical evaluation and discussion. (60%) Use of literature and referencing. (20%) Distinction (70-100%) Merit (60-69%) Pass (50-59%) A detailed and focussed review of CD19 as a target and the relative strengths and limitations of different therapeutic approaches, which shows a deep critical evaluation of the data and the cited literature. A detailed and focussed review of CD19 as a target and the relative strengths and limitations of different therapeutic approaches. There is evidence that appropriate published data has been evaluated, but the evaluation is sometimes rather superficial.

Some aspects of CD19 as a target and the relative strengths and limitations of the different therapeutic approaches are well considered. However, key points are missing and there is a lack of critical evaluation of the supporting evidence. Very limited, but still largely accurate, review of CD19 as a target and the relative strengths and limitations of the different therapeutic approaches Limited review CD19 as a target and the relative strengths and limitations of the different therapeutic approaches showing considerable errors and lack of understanding. Arguments are supported using a broad range of primary sources. Correct formatting of citations and reference list used throughout.

Most of the arguments presented are supported using a broad range of primary sources. Correct formatting of citations and reference list used throughout. A reasonable range of primary literature is accessed, but some of the arguments made are not supported by appropriate references. Citations and reference list provided, but with some omissions or formatting errors. Some key primary sources cited, but use of literature is limited and incomplete. Citations and reference list provided, but with omissions or formatting errors. Lack, or limited range, of literature cited, with considerable reliance on secondary sources. Incorrect use of referencing format. Weak (40-49%) Poor (1-39%) 4 Grading Rubric Written expression and structure. (20%) Written expression is clear and concise. Arguments are put forward succinctly and the structure of the piece is well-planned, wellthought out and logical, enhancing its readability. Written expression is clear but could be more concise. Report is generally well structured but could benefit from better use of informative sub-headings and clearer highlighting of key points. Written expression is mostly clear and arguments can be followed without undue difficulty. The structure of the work is satisfactory but planning could have been more thorough in parts. Written expression makes some of the arguments difficult to access. The structure is somewhat fragmented and material is not presented efficiently. Evidence of lack of care in planning. Writing style causes considerable difficulty following arguments. Lack of effective structure to report. China Cancer Medical Therapy Paper.