Cognitive Testing Instruments

Cognitive Testing Instruments

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON Cognitive Testing Instruments

How might a clinician determine a client’s cognitive abilities or how might a clinician integrate testing data reflecting a client’s cognitive abilities into a therapeutic intervention? Evaluating a test used to measure cognitive ability takes skill to recognize what type of cognitive assessment is most appropriate based upon the client’s presenting issues.

For this Assignment, review the interactive media, Virtual Client. Revisit the virtual client that you have selected and review the presenting issues. Consider what types of cognitive tests are appropriate to use to evaluate his or her cognitive abilities based on the client information. In addition, review the hypothetical cognitive tests results and analyze these results in light of your client’s presenting and in formulating a plan of treatment.

The Assignment (5–7 pages):

Part A:

  • Summarize the presenting problem of the virtual client and create a hypothesis.
  • Select a cognitive test from the Mental Measurements Yearbook. (Note: You are to select a test that is not listed in this week’s Learning Resources.)
  • Evaluate and explain why this test is most appropriate to assess the client’s cognitive skills and justify your selection.

Part B:

    • Evaluate the Mock Assessment Results provided below.
    • Explain whether the evaluation results support or invalidate your hypothesis of the presenting problem.
    • Justify your response.
    • Briefly describe which additional tests or assessment methods that you might consider for your client.
    • Explain two ways that you might integrate the evaluation results into client treatment planning and why.

Mock Assessment Results

Locate your virtual client in the following list.

Results of Assessment for CHC Factors:

      • Virtual Client 1: Weakness in Gs and Gr; Strength in Gf
      • Virtual Client 2: Weakness in Gs
      • Virtual client 3: weakness in Gr

Reference

Mental Measurements Yearbook

      • Test: Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition.
        Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Mental Measurements Yearbook database.
      • Test: Pearson. (2003). Otis-Lennon school ability test(r), eighth edition.
        Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Mental Measurements Yearbook database.
      • Test: The Psychological Corp. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence.
        Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Mental Measurements Yearbook database.
      • Test: Wechsler, D., & Naglieri, J. (2006). Wechsler nonverbal scale of ability.
        Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Mental Measurements Yearbook database.
      • Test: Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., Mather, N., & Schrank, F. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III diagnostic supplement to the tests of cognitive abilities.
        Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Mental Measurements Yearbook database.

https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201930_27/MS_CPSY/CPSY_6341/artifacts/CPSY6341_Week07_transcript.htm

  • Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications
    • Chapter 5, “Theories and Individual Tests of Intelligence and Achievement”
      • Topic 5B: “Individual Tests of Intelligence and Achievement” (pp. 159–181)
    • Chapter 6, “Groups Tests and Controversies in Ability Testing”
      • Topic 6A: “Group Tests of Ability and Related Concepts”
  • Book Excerpt: Gottfredson, L. S. (2009). Logical fallacies used to dismiss the evidence on intelligence testing. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing (pp. 11–65). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Logical fallacies used to dismiss the evidence on intelligence testing. In R. P. Phelps, R. P. Phelps (Eds.), Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing by R. P. Phelps. Copyright 2009 by AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (BOOKS). Reprinted by permission of AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (BOOKS) via the Copyright Clearance Center.

 

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Cognitive Testing Instruments

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the co ntent.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. Cognitive Testing Instruments

LopesWrite Policy 

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Cognitive Testing Instruments