Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Assignment 2

Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their personal and medical history? What are their symptoms of concern? How long have they been experiencing them, and what is the severity? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning?
Objective: What observations did you make during the interview and review of systems?
Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three (3) possible diagnoses. List them from highest to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why?
Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Name: PRAC_6635_Week9_Assignment2_Rubric

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Photo ID display and professional attire	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally. Feedback:
Time	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.) Feedback:
Description of chief complaint and history of present illness	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) The student provides an accurate description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness, or description is missing. Feedback:
Description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) The student provides an accurate description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history, or description is missing. Feedback:
Discussion of most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems	Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The student provides an accurate discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback:
Discussion of diagnostics with results	Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The student provides an accurate discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback:
Diagnosis with three (3) differentials	Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The student provides an accurate diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, less than 3 or incomplete diagnosis with differentials. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Less than 2 diagnosis. Feedback:
Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation	Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback:
Presentation style	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. Feedback: