Discussion Week 5 Literature Review
Discussion Week 5 Literature Review
A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table(I give you PICOT question and the table below, with link for articles that you will be use in essay), assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:
1. Title page
2. Introduction section
3. A comparison of research questions
4. A comparison of sample populations
5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
PICOT Question.(ONLY BY INFORMATION ABOUT ESSAY)
How does a knowledge of influenza vaccine advantages increase disposition to receive flu vaccination in young adults, during flu season as compared to adults without educational knowledge?
The articles answers question related to the patient advantages of influenza vaccine, approached the issue from scientific fact. The subject will be the base of an educative project in the community of Homestead, Florida.
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
| Criteria | Article 1 | Article 2 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
Affelt & Stacia
Hearst Magazines, a division of Hearst Communications, Inc. Prevention. Vol. 70 Issue 10, p40-43. 4p. 1 Color Photograph. http://www.prevention.com/cda/homepage.do
|
Nichol, KL., Nordin., J.D., Nelson, B.D., Mullooly, J.P., & Hak, E.
.N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 4;357(14):1373-81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17914038 Discussion Week 5 Literature Review
|
| Article Title and Year Published
|
5 Myths About the Flu Vaccine. 2018 | Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine in the Community-Dwelling Elderly. 2007 |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study
|
Qualitative. Shows misconceptions about flu vaccine. | Quantitative. Influenza decrease risk hospitalization and death in elderly patients |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Qualitative, ethnography design | Quantitative, statistic design |
| Setting/Sample
|
General population | Community-dwelling elderly persons |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
Survey | Data were pooled from 18 cohorts of community-dwelling elderly members of one U.S |
| Analysis
|
Descriptive analyses, facts about flu vaccine | Logistic regression was used to estimate the effectiveness of the vaccine |
| Key Findings
|
The flu virus easily spreads when one interacts with other. | Vaccination was associated with a 27% reduction in the risk of hospitalization for pneumonia or influenza. |
| Recommendations
|
Yearly vaccine for everyone ages 6 months or older | Achieving optimal success in preventing and controlling influenza among the elderly may require more immunogenic vaccines and new strategies that induce greater levels of herd immunity and thereby interrupt influenza transmission in communities. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
|
I can use the facts to explain the patients, why annual flu vaccine is recommended | Vaccination was still associated with statistically significant reductions in the risks of both hospitalization and death in elderly patients |
| Criteria | Article 3 | Article 4 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
Manca, T. Department of Sociology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Biomedical; Double Blind Peer Reviewed; Europe; Peer Reviewed;
Health, Risk & Society.Vol. 18, Nos. 3–4, 114–136, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2016.1190319
|
Ramsay, L.C., Buchan, S.A., Stirling, R.G., Cowling, BJ., Feng, S., Kwong, JC., Warshawsky BF.
BMC Med. 2018 Aug 12;16(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1137-0.
|
| Article Title and Year Published
|
Health professionals and the vaccine narrative: ‘the power of the personal story’ and the management of medical uncertainty. 2016 | The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2018. |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study
|
Quantitative and Qualitative. How professional interpret vaccine doubt and teaching a patient | Quantitative. Analyses vaccines effectiveness (VE) in 2017 season and prior season, and how the circulating virus math with vaccine. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Quantitative and Qualitative. Ethnography design
|
Quantitative, observational study designs (e.g., prospective cohort, test-negative case-control) |
| Setting/Sample
|
Community | Vaccinated patients different data-bases and no vaccinated patients. |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
Survey and statistical analysis | Meta- analysis |
| Analysis
|
Interviews with twenty-six physicians and seven nurses in Alberta, Canada | Statistical analysis the VE e impact of repeated vaccination, concern to policymakers regarding annual influenza vaccination recommendation |
| Key Findings
|
Health professional explained to patients, vaccination based on narratives instead of using scientific facts | From the patient’s perspective, vaccination in the current season is generally the best option regardless of prior season vaccination. From a policy perspective, our study found no overall evidence that repeated vaccination over two seasons has a negative impact on current season VE |
| Recommendations
|
Use scientific fact about flu vaccine in patient’s teaching | Yearly flu season |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
|
How teaching to patients should be focused on scientific facts. | Importance of flu vaccine by patient based in EBP |
Discussion Week 5 Literature Review
| Criteria | Article 5 | Article 6 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
Grohskopf, LA., Sokolow, LZ, Broder, KP., Walter, EB., AMn, F & Jernigan, DB.
Recommendations and Reports / August 24, 2018 / 67(3);1–20
|
Gomez, Y., Leguen, F., Zhang, G & O’Connell E.
Vaccine. 2012 Jun 8;30(27):4002-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.037. Epub 2012 Apr 25. |
| Article Title and Year Published
|
Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2018–19 Influenza Season. 2018 | Correlates of 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccination among day care-aged children, Miami-Dade County.2012. |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study
|
Quantitative and meta-analysis. Type flu vaccine recommended by patient age. | Quantitative |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Quantitative. Statistic design. | Quantitative. Statistic design. |
| Setting/Sample
|
General population | Community day care-aged children. |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
Teleconference and statistical analysis | A cross-sectional study |
| Analysis
|
Statistical analysis the type of vaccine according patient age, and circulating virus by geographic zone in flu season 2018-2019 | Descriptive analyses shows the lack of knowledge in parents about flu vaccine. |
| Key Findings
|
Policies and procedures in management of influenzas illness in flu season 2018-2019 | Misperceptions about influenza vaccination among parents created a barrier to 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccination. |
| Recommendations
|
Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. | Circulate vaccine information to the public and health care providers and initiatives targeting minority groups may increase vaccination coverage among this population. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
|
Type vaccine recommended in Florida by patient age in season 2017-2018. It serves as a scientific fact for patient teaching | Data collected in Miami Dade, Florida, it shows a lack of knowledge the scientific fact of advantage of flu vaccine. |
| Criteria | Article 7 | Article 8 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
Principi N & Esposito S.
Evolve Elsevier. Vaccine. Volume 36, Issue 36, 28 August 2018, Pages 5391-5396 |
Thomas, RE. & Lorenzetti DL.
Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group, published in Issue 7, 2018. |
| Article Title and Year Published
|
Influenza vaccine use to protect healthy children: A debated topic. 2017 | Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study
|
Qualitative. The positive effect the influenza vaccine in healthy children the all age. | Intervention by increases community response to vaccinated. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Qualitative. Ethnography design. | Qualitative and quantitative. Statistic design. |
| Setting/Sample | Community, pediatric population (younger children and in school-aged) and pregnant woman | Community setting |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
Descriptive analyses | Standard methodological procedures as specified by Cochrane and meta-analyses. |
| Analysis
|
Discuss importance of vaccine in create immunity in pregnant woman and pediatric population | Intervention that promote patient response to vaccination. |
| Key Findings
|
Several factors seem to indicate that vaccination against influenza of healthy children of any age and of pregnant women can be effective in preventing the disease in the entire pediatric population and in providing herd immunity in adults and old people | Interventions that helps to increase response of the community for vaccination, enhance access, and improve provider/system response. |
| Recommendations
|
Increase amount of people vaccinated and put aware the health authorities relate this topic | Encourage the healthcare providers to use the interventions to increase the uptake of influenza vaccination in people aged 60 years and older in the community. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
|
The author brings information that help the patient do the right choices and decisions respect to accept to get the vaccine in pediatric and pregnant woman. | The same intervention can be use in the community that increase community demand for flu vaccination |