Distance education learning for nursing students

Distance Education Learning 1 2 3 Unsatisfactory 0%Less Than Satisfactory 81-88% 75% Satisfactory 76-80% 88.00% 0.00% 80.00% 70.0 %Content 20.0 % Describes A Neglects to Faculty, Student, describe a faculty, Or Administrative student, or Issue That Impacts administrative Distanceissue that impacts Education distance-education Learning learning. Describes a faculty, Describes a faculty, student, or student, or administrative issue administrative issue that impacts that impacts distance-education distance-education learning, but the learning in a information perfunctory manner. provided is Minimal detail or incomplete, support is provided. inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. 25.0 % Examines the Issue and its Significance to Distance Education Neglects to examine the issue and its significance to distance education. 25.0 % Proposes Strategies to Meet Challenges posed By The Selected Issue as Assumed from a Position of a Nursing or Patient Educator, Inclusive of Relevant Professional Standards Does not propose Proposes some Proposes strategies strategies to meet strategies to meet to meet challenges challenges posed challenges posed by posed by the by the selected the selected issue selected issue as issue as assumed as assumed from a assumed from a from a position of a position of a nursing position of a nursing nursing or patient or patient educator, or patient educator, educator. There is inclusive of relevant inclusive of relevant no inclusion of professional professional professional standards, but the standards in a standards. information perfunctory manner. provided is Minimal detail or incomplete, support is provided. inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. 13.0 %Assignment Criteria 5.0 % Assignment Quantitative Criteria (word count, timespan, slide number, etc.) Examines the issue Examines the issue and its significance and its significance to distance to distance education, but the education in a information perfunctory manner. provided is Minimal detail or incomplete, support is provided. inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Unacceptable Poor adherence to adherence to applicable applicable assignment assignment quantitative quantitative criteria. Submission criteria. Distance education learning for nursing students

Submission incorporates 25% incorporates 0% – 50% of the required 25% of the required criteria for the criteria for the chosen format. chosen format. 4 Good 89-92% 92.00% 5 Excellent (93 – 100%) 100.00% Describes a faculty, student, or administrative issue that impacts distance-education learning in full. The description further encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. Describes a faculty, student, or administrative issue that impacts distanceeducation learning clearly and comprehensively. The submission additionally incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. Examines the issue Examines the issue and and its significance to its significance to distance education in distance education full. The description clearly and further encompasses comprehensively. The essential details and submission additionally provides appropriate incorporates analysis of support. supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. Proposes strategies to Proposes strategies to meet challenges meet challenges posed posed by the selected by the selected issue as issue as assumed from assumed from a position a position of a nursing of a nursing or patient or patient educator, educator, inclusive of inclusive of relevant relevant professional professional standards standards clearly and in full. The comprehensively. The description further submission additionally encompasses incorporates analysis of essential details and supporting evidence provides appropriate insightfully and provides support. specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. Weak adherence to Adequate adherence applicable to applicable assignment assignment quantitative criteria. quantitative criteria. Submission Submission incorporates 50% – incorporates 90% of 75% of the required the required criteria criteria for the for the chosen chosen format. format. Excellent adherence to applicable assignment quantitative criteria. Submission incorporates 100% of the required criteria for the chosen format. 5.0 % Scholarly references (Utilizes a minimum of three current scholarly, evidence-based, peer-reviewed resources less than five years old, in addition to course materials) Submission utilizes Weak selection of only course sufficient & materials. Selected relevant literature references are (less than 5 years absent or do not old) no scholarly, meet stated peer-reviewed criteria. references used other than course materials) Uses only course materials. Fair selection of sufficient & relevant literature (less than 5 years old) at least 1 scholarly, peerreviewed references used – other than course materials) Does not use evidence-based sources when available. NoneSentence structure is correct and occasionally varies. Word choices and language are appropriate to the targeted audience. Distance education learning for nursing students

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in composition and/or in their relationship to each other. 3.0 % Language Inappropriate word Some distracting Use and Audience choice and or and or Awareness sentence structure, inconsistencies in (includes sentence lack of variety in language choice, construction, language use which sentence structure, word choice, etc.) suggests and or word choice unawareness of are present. Some audience. paragraphs and Paragraphs and transitions may lack transitions logical progression consistently lack of ideas, unity, unity and coherence, and or coherence. cohesiveness. Some Composition is degree of disjointed. composition is evident. 12.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 % Thesis Submission lacks Thesis is Thesis is apparent Development and any discernible insufficiently and appropriate to Purpose overall purpose or developed or vague. purpose. organizing claim. Purpose is not clear. Partial selection of sufficient & relevant literature (less than 5 years old) at least 2 scholarly, peerreviewed references used – other than course materials) Uses evidence-based sources when available. Excellent selection of sufficient & relevant literature (less than 5 years old) at least 3 scholarly, peer-reviewed references used – other than course materials) Uses evidence-based sources when available. NClearly aware of Uses a variety of audience; uses a sentence constructions, variety of sentence figures of speech, and structures and word choices in unique appropriate and creative ways that vocabulary; uses are appropriate to figures of speech to purpose, discipline, and communicate clearly. scope. There is a Paragraphs exhibit a sophisticated unity, coherence, and construction of cohesiveness. Topic paragraphs and sentences and transitions. Individually concluding remarks and collectively, are used paragraphs are coherent appropriately.ne and cohesive Thesis is clear and Thesis is comprehensive forecasts the and contains the essence development of the of the paper. Thesis paper. Thesis is statement makes the descriptive and purpose of the paper reflective of the clear. arguments and appropriate to the purpose. 5.0 % Argument Statement of Sufficient Argument is orderly, Argument shows Clear and convincing Logic and purpose is not justification of but may have a few logical progressions. argument that presents Construction justified by the claims is lacking. inconsistencies. Distance education learning for nursing students

The Techniques of a persuasive claim in a conclusion. The Argument lacks argument presents argumentation are distinctive and conclusion does not consistent unity. minimal justification evident. There is a compelling manner. All support the claim There are obvious of claims. Argument smooth progression of sources are made. Argument is flaws in the logic. logically, but not claims from authoritative. incoherent and Some sources have thoroughly, supports introduction to uses noncredible questionable the purpose. Sources conclusion. Most sources. credibility. used are credible. sources are Introduction and authoritative. conclusion bracket the thesis. 2.0 % Mechanics Surface errors are Frequent and Some mechanical Prose is largely free Writer is clearly in of Writing pervasive enough repetitive errors or typos are of mechanical errors, command of standard, (includes spelling, that they impede mechanical errors present, but they although a few may written, academic punctuation, communication of distract the reader. are not overly be present. Distance education learning for nursing students

The English. grammar, meaning. Inconsistencies in distracting to the writer uses a variety language use) Inappropriate word language choice reader. Correct and of effective sentence choice or sentence (register) or word varied sentence structures and figures choice are present. structure and of speech. 5.0 %Format 3.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) construction is used. Sentence structure audienceis correct but not appropriate language varied. are employed. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. Distance education learning for nursing students

A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 2.0 % Sources are not Documentation of documented. Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template All format elements are is fully used. There correct. are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. …
Distance education learning for nursing students