DNP 834 Quality & Safety in Contemporary Nursing Essay

Course Code DNP-835 Class Code DNP-835-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Understanding of Quality and/or Safety Measures and Its Relationship to Nursing Science 20.0% Contemporary Example of Quality or Safety Applied in Nursing Science 20.0% Quality and/or Safety Components for Analyzing Program Outcomes 20.0% Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations 10.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0%

Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Quality and Sustainability Paper Part One – Quality and Safety Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Paper does not utilize quality and/or safety; the relationship to nursing science is not described. An example of quality and/or safety in nursing science is not presented. Quality and/or safety components for program analysis are not identified. No analysis is completed. None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present.

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Total Points 150.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Paper demonstrates a minimal understanding of quality and/or safety. The presentation of quality and/or safety is inaccurate, incomplete, or lacks support. A clear relationship between quality and/or safety and nursing science has not been established. An example of quality and/or safety is discussed, but the example is not relevant to contemporary nursing science. Some quality and/or safety components for program analysis are not identified. No analysis is completed. Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (88.00%) Paper demonstrates a general understanding of quality and/or safety. The representation of quality and/or safety is accurate, but lacks specific elements important to quality and/or safety. A general relationship to nursing science is established, but the role of quality and/or safety in nursing science is unclear or does not represent nursing science An example of quality and/or safety in nursing science is discussed, but the example is outdated. Quality and/or safety components are identified but no analysis is provided. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good (92.00%) Paper demonstrates an understanding of quality and/or safety.

The representation of quality and/or safety is accurate and the main elements of quality and/or safety are addressed. A relationship to nursing science is established, and the role of quality and/or safety represents nursing science today. An example of quality and/or safety in nursing science is discussed. Quality and/or safety components are identified but missing clarification. Analysis requires more depth. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from reputable, professional sources. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) Paper demonstrates a functional understanding of quality and/or safety.

The representation of quality and/or safety is specific and thoroughly described. A clear relationship to nursing science is established. The responsibility of quality and/or safety in nursing science, and the outcome of implementing these measures, is discussed and well An example of quality and/or safety in nursing science is discussed. The relevance of quality and/or safety, the importance to health care, and the outcomes are well illustrated. Quality and/or safety components are thoroughly identified, and analysis of their impact on program outcomes is well presented.

All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Comments Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned DNP 834 Quality & Safety in Contemporary Nursing Essay