+1 (417) 242-6748    support@nursingessaygurus.com

RELIABLE PARTNER IN
NURSING ESSAY WRITING

Get your project completed by MDs and PhDs

Early Greek Hospital Organizational Policy Proposal and Strategies PPT

Early Greek Hospital Organizational Policy Proposal and Strategies PPT

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS HERE Early Greek Hospital Organizational Policy Proposal and Strategies PPT

Record a slide presentation with audio voiceover, supported by 8-12-slides, for one of the stakeholder groups identified in your Assessment 2 Policy Proposal, which addresses current performance shortfalls, the reasons why new policy and practice guidelines are needed to eliminate those shortfalls, and how the group’s work will benefit from the changes.

INTRODUCTION

It is important that health care leaders be able to clearly articulate policy positions and recommendations and garner buy-in and support from stakeholder groups for policy and practice changes in their organizations. Unfortunately, effective communication is often lacking. Consequently, it is important for health care leaders, when leading change, to ensure that clear and open communication is ongoing and informative.

An important aspect of change leadership is the ability to address diverse groups of stakeholders and create buy-in and support for your ideas and proposals for change. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate and hone these skills.

Record a slide presentation, with audio voiceover, for one of the stakeholder groups you identified in your Assessment 2 Policy Proposal. Inform the group of current performance shortfalls, introduce the proposed policy, explain why the policy is needed, and present policy-driven practice guidelines to resolve the performance issue. You must also obtain buy-in from the group by explaining the positive effects of the policy and practice guidelines on their work.

Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft presentation to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

REQUIREMENTS

The presentation requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for presentation format and length and for supporting evidence.

  • Summarize your proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines.
    • Identify applicable local, state, or federal health care policy or law that prescribes relevant performance benchmarks that your policy proposal addresses.
    • Keep your audience in mind when creating this summary.
  • Interpret, for stakeholders, the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for the proposed policy and practice guidelines.
    • Make sure this is a brief review of the evaluation you completed in your Assessment 1 Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation.
    • Make sure you are interpreting the dashboard metrics in a way that is understandable and meaningful to the stakeholders to whom you are presenting.
  • Explain how your proposed policy and practice guidelines will affect how the stakeholder group does its work.
    • How might your proposal alter certain tasks or how the stakeholder group performs them?
    • How might your proposal affect the stakeholder group’s workload?
    • How might your proposal alter the responsibilities of the stakeholder group?
    • How might your proposal improve working conditions for the stakeholder group?
  • Explain how your proposed policy and practice guidelines will improve quality and outcomes for the stakeholder group.
    • How are your proposed changes going to improve the quality of the stakeholder group’s work?
    • How will these improvements enable the stakeholder group to be more successful?
    • What evidence supports your conclusions or presents alternative perspectives?
  • Present strategies for collaborating with the stakeholder group to implement your proposed policy and practice guidelines.
    • What role will the stakeholder group play in implementing your proposal?
    • Why is the stakeholder group and their collaboration important for successful implementation?
  • Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.
    • Address the anticipated needs and concerns of your audience.
    • Stay focused on key policy provisions and the impact of practice guidelines on the group.
    • Adhere to presentation best practices.
    • Proofread your presentation slides to minimize errors that could distract the audience and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your proposed policy and practice guidelines.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Presentation Format and Length

You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

If using PowerPoint to create your presentation slides, you may use the following presentation as a template.

Be sure your slide deck includes the following slides:

  • Title slide.
    • Presentation title.
    • Your name.
    • Date.
    • Course number and title.
  • References (at the end of your presentation). Apply current APA formatting to all citations and references.

Your slide deck should consist of 8–12 slides, not including a title and references slide.

Note: If you have technical difficulties in recording your audio, you may, in place of the audio, provide a complete script of what you intended to say in the notes section of each slide. If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations.

Supporting Evidence

Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly, professional, or policy evidence to support your analysis and recommendations.

Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your presentation to your ePortfolio.

COMPETENCIES MEASURED

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze relevant health care laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.
    • Explain how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will affect how a stakeholder group does its work.
  • Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.
    • Summarize a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines.
    • Explain how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will improve quality and outcomes for a stakeholder group.
  • Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform health care laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.
    • Interpret, for stakeholders, the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for a proposed policy and practice guidelines.
  • Competency 4: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.
    • Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.
    • Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation.

 

Unformatted Attachment Preview

POLICY PROPOSAL PRESENTATION LEARNER’S NAME CAPELLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE LAW AND POLICY POLICY PROPOSAL PRESENTATION JANUARY, 2020 Presentation Outline ■ Policy on Managing Medication Errors ■ Need for a Policy ■ Scope of the Policy ■ Strategies to Resolve Medication Errors ■ Role of the Hospital Staff ■ Positive Impact on Working Conditions ■ Issues in the Application of Strategies ■ Alternative Perspectives on Mitigating Medication Errors ■ Stakeholder Participation Policy on Managing Medication Errors ■ Analyzing medication error trends and addressing shortfalls regularly ■ Establishing automated dispensing cabinets to manage medication ■ Training hospital staff and pharmacists on medication error prevention ■ Educating patients on potential areas of medication error Need for a Policy ■ Increase in medication errors from 2015 to 2016 by 50% ■ Medication errors can increase the cost of health care ■ Medication errors can cause significant harm to patients ■ Managing medication errors is essential for quality improvement The policy applies to: Nursing and medical staff Scope of the Policy Emergency and allied care practitioners Pharmacists and pharmacy staff Patients and family members Board members Strategies to Resolve Medication Errors (1) Medication error analysis ■ Uses failure mode and effects analysis ■ Evaluates potential vulnerabilities in medical processes ■ Identifies actions that could reduce potential errors ■ Mitigates the risk and impact of repeated errors Strategies to Resolve Medication Errors (2) Automated dispensing cabinets ■ Store, dispense, and electronically track drugs ■ Assist the medical center in profiling patients ■ Reduce the time taken to retrieve medication ■ Track inventory on a real-time basis Role of the Staff ■ Identify the right workflow ■ Maintain optimum inventory ■ Establish procedures for accurate withdrawal of medication ■ Establish guidelines for reporting errors ■ Conduct training Positive Impact on Working Conditions ■ Improvement in the safety of medication system ■ Mitigation of future errors ■ Optimum stock of medication ■ Reduced reliance on verbal orders Issues in Application of Strategies ■ Irregular or inaccurate documentation ■ Incorrect restocking of automated dispensing cabinets ■ Inefficient functioning of dispensing cabinets ■ Complexities in point-of-care drug order entry Alternative Perspectives on Mitigating Medication Errors ■ Using robotic systems for medication distribution ■ Linking supply ordering with medication distribution system Stakeholder Participation ■ Key administrative personnel will form a quality committee ■ Nursing staff will identify processes in which most medication errors occur ■ Pharmacists should ensure strict compliance of stocking and dispensing policies ■ Board members will ensure transparency and efficiency ■ Patients and family members will provide feedback for improvement References (1) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017). Guide to patient and family engagement in hospital quality and safety. Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/engagingfamilies/index.html Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (n.d.). Guidance for performing failure mode and effects analysis with performance improvement projects.
Retrieved from https://cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-andCertification/QAPI/downloads/GuidanceForFMEA.pdf Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2017). Patient safety standards. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityInitiativesGenInfo/ACAMQI/Patient-Safety/MQI-Patient-Safety.html Code of Maryland Regulations. (n.d.). Hospital patient safety program. Retrieved from http://qups.org/med_errors.php?c=internal&id=172 Darwesh, B. M., Machudo, S. Y., & John, S. (2017). The experience of using an automated dispensing system to improve medication safety and management at King Abdul aziz University Hospital. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine 3(3), 114–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.5530/jppcm.2017.3.26 Elden, N. M. K., & Ismail, A. (2016). The importance of medication errors reporting in improving the quality of clinical care services. Global Journal of Health Science, 8(8), 243–251. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n8p243 Ferencz, N. (2014). Safety of automated dispensing systems. U.S. Pharmacist. Retrieved from https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/safety-of-automated-dispensing-systems Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Failure modes and effects analysis. Retrieved from http://ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/medicalschool/facultyAffairs/moc/Forms/Documents/MOCPAP/FailureModes andEffectsAnalysis_IHI.pdf References (2) Kavanagh, C. (2017). Medication governance: Preventing errors and promoting patient safety. British Journal of Nursing, 26(3), 159–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.3.159 Parand, A., Dopson, S., Renz, A., & Vincent, C. (2014). The role of hospital managers in quality and patient safety: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 4(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005055 Rochais, É., Atkinson, S., Guilbeault, M., & Bussières, J.-F. (2014). Nursing perception of the impact of automated dispensing cabinets on patient safety and ergonomics in a teaching health care center. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 27(2), 150–157.Early Greek Hospital Organizational Policy Proposal and Strategies PPT
https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0897190013507082 Rodriguez-Gonzalez, C. G., Herranz-Alonso, A., Escudero-Vilaplana, V., Ais-Larisgoitia, M. A., Iglesias-Peinado, I., & SanjurjoSaez, M. (2019). Robotic dispensing improves patient safety, inventory management, and staff satisfaction in an outpatient hospital pharmacy. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(1), 28-35. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136339 Rovers, J. P., & Mages, M. D. (2017). A model for a drug distribution system in remote Australia as a social determinant of health using event structure analysis . BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 677. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946918 The Health Foundation. (2012). Evidence scan: Reducing prescribing errors. Retrieved from https://health.org.uk/sites/default/files/ReducingPrescribingErrors.pdf Weant, K. A., Bailey, A. M., & Baker, S. N. (2014). Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department. Open Access Emergency Medicine, 6, 45–55. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S64174 PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATION GUIDELINES DATE Name (Presenter) Capella University School of Nursing and Health Sciences Course © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary MICROSOFT POWERPOINT ▪ Disseminates information ▪ Can add visuals such as illustrations or graphs ▪ Can add film clips, sound, and animation © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 1 GETTING STARTED ▪ Create a topic outline based on grading rubric ❑ Do not use complete sentences for headings ▪ Choose a slide design ❑ ▪ Consider contrast of text and background Create a slide or two as needed ❑ Address each criterion in the rubric © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 2 GENERAL GUIDELINES ▪ 5–7 Rule ❑ ❑ Limit words to 5–7 per line Limit lines to 5–7 per slide ▪ Typography ❑ ❑ ❑ Headline type should be 24–28 points Bullet or body type should be 14–18 points for readability Avoid decorative type: use Arial or Times © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 3 EXTRAS: TYPOGRAPHIC ELEMENTS Fancy lettering for titles: best for flyers or posters © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 4 EXTRAS: GRAPHIC SUPPORT ELEMENTS Add text in or out of the grid © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary Smart Art More interesting than a table To present points with flair Don’t overdo it! A good way 5 EXTRAS: ILLUSTRATIONS 6 Avoid low-resolution or copyrighted art and photos © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary SPEAKER’S NOTES © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 7 RECORDED PRESENTATIONS: KALTURA 8 Using Kaltura Campus resource © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary RECORDED PRESENTATIONS: ADOBE CONNECT Adobe Connect Quick Start Tutorial © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 9 FINISHING THE PRESENTATION ▪ Proofread ▪ Proofread again ▪ Run spell check ▪ Read it aloud ▪ Ask someone to read it to you © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 10 RECAP ▪ Summary ▪ Introduction ❑ Tell audience what you will tell them ▪ Body ❑ Present the content ▪ Conclusion/Summary ❑ Review briefly what you have covered ▪ Questions © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 11 RESOURCES 12 ▪ Using Adobe Connect ▪ Adobe Connect Quick Start Tutorial ▪ Using Kaltura ▪ Kaltura Basics Tutorial ▪ Microsoft Office Software ▪ Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX] ▪ How Do I Cite an Image in a PowerPoint Presentation? (APA Style) ▪ PowerPoint Presentations Capella Library Guide ▪ Microsoft Office: Create or Remove a Hanging Indent in PowerPoint ▪ Microsoft Office: Make Your PowerPoint Presentations Accessible © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary 13 Thank You! © 2018 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY – Confidential and Proprietary Policy Proposal Presentation Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Summarize a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines. Does not summarize a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines. Provides a summary that paints an unclear picture of a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines. Summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines. Succinctly summarizes a proposed organizational policy and practice guidelines. Presents information and keys points that enable the target audience to readily grasp the goals, scope, and importance of the proposed policy and practice guidelines. Interpret, for stakeholders, the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Does not present relevant benchmark metrics to stakeholders.Early Greek Hospital Organizational Policy Proposal and Strategies PPT
Presents relevant benchmark metrics to stakeholders. Interprets, for stakeholders, the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Interprets, for stakeholders, the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Clearly and convincingly presents the evidence that supports the need for changes in policy and practice. Explain how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will affect how a stakeholder group does its work. Does not present Presents policy-driven practice policy-driven practice changes that will affect the changes that will stakeholder group’s work. affect the stakeholder group’s work. Explains how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will affect how a stakeholder group does its work. Explains how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will affect how a stakeholder group does its work. Provides an honest and accurate assessment of practice changes and their precise impact on stakeholders. Explain how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will improve quality and outcomes for a stakeholder group. Does not explain how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will improve quality and outcomes for a stakeholder group. Presents unclear or unsubstantiated cause-and- effect relationships between the proposed policy and practice guidelines and expected improvements in quality and outcomes. Explains how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will improve quality and outcomes for a stakeholder group. Provides a clear, concise, explanation of how a proposed policy and practice guidelines will improve quality and outcomes for a stakeholder group. Emphasizes the benefits to the group of the proposed changes, supported by credible evidence, and impartially addresses conflicting data or alternative perspectives. Present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines.
Does not present strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Presents stakeholder collaboration strategies for implementing a proposed policy and practice guidelines that lack clear relevance or insight into the positions and perspectives of the stakeholder group. Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Presents strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement a proposed policy and practice guidelines. Makes a compelling case for the importance of stakeholder collaboration and considers stakeholder perspectives by addressing possible objections. Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation. Does not deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation. Delivers an audiovisual presentation that lacks clear purpose, coherence, or focus, or is supported by slides that that add minimal value to the presentation. Delivers a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation. Delivers a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation, well suited to the information needs and concerns of the target audience. Presents clear and convincing arguments and main points, well supported by error-free slides that adhere to visual design best practices. …Early Greek Hospital Organizational Policy Proposal and Strategies PPT