ECE 465 Clinical Field Experience Discussion

ECE 465 Clinical Field Experience Discussion

ECE 465 Clinical Field Experience Discussion

To successfully assess social studies learning, educators need to use a variety of assessment tools and strategies to measure student learning. These assessments will help determine the effectiveness of learning experiences and meet diverse student needs.

Allocate at least 3 hours in the field to support this field experience.

Arrange to observe or assist your mentor teacher in administering a summative assessment. Following the assessment, work with your mentor teacher to grade the assessments. Discuss the results of the assessment with your mentor, addressing the following topics:

How the teacher addresses diverse student needs in the assessment process. Provide examples
Forms of assessments used in verifying student learning of social studies concepts
How the results of the summative assessment inform future instruction
How data collected from the assessments will help you meet the needs of diverse students in your classroom
In 250-500 words, reflect on the assessment process and summarize the discussion with your mentor teacher. How will you apply what you have learned in assessing learning to future professional practice?

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Course Code ECE-465 Class Code ECE-465-O500 Criteria Criteria Percentage 100.0% Diverse Student Needs 15.0% Forms of Assessment 15.0% Informing Future Instruction 15.0% Meeting Diverse Needs 15.0% Applications to Future Practice 20.0% Organization 10.0% Mechanics 10.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Clinical Field Experience D: Assessment Observation No Submission (0.00%) Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Total Points 30.0 Insufficient (65.00%) Description of how the mentor teacher addressed diverse student needs in the assessment process is vague including few examples from the observation. Discussion on the forms of assessments that were used in verifying student learning of social studies concepts is minimal. Discussion on how the results of the summative assessment will inform future instruction is unclear. Discussion on how the data from assessments help determine how to meet diverse student needs is irrelevant. Application to future professional practice is minimal or irrelevant for the classroom setting. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Approaching (75.00%) Description of how the mentor teacher addressed diverse student needs in the assessment process is adequate, including minimal examples from the observation. Discussion on the forms of assessments that were used in verifying student learning of social studies concepts is sufficient. Discussion on how the results of the summative assessment will inform future instruction is broad. Discussion on how the data from assessments help determine how to meet diverse student needs is adequate. Application to future professional practice is simplistic but appropriate for the classroom setting. ECE 465 Clinical Field Experience Discussion

The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense of the main idea. Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Acceptable (85.00%) Description of how the mentor teacher addressed diverse student needs in the assessment process is detailed, including clear examples from the observation. The forms of assessments that were used in verifying student learning of social studies concepts are clearly discussed. Discussion on how the results of the summative assessment will inform future instruction is logical. Discussion on how the data from assessments help determine how to meet diverse student needs is plausible. Application to future professional practice is meaningful, realistic for the classroom setting, and reflects professional growth. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. Target (100.00%) Description of how the mentor teacher addressed diverse student needs in the assessment process is comprehensive, including specific examples from the observation. The forms of assessments that were used in verifying student learning of social studies concepts are expertly discussed. Discussion on how the results of the summative assessment will inform future instruction is insightful. Discussion on how the data from assessments help determine how to meet diverse student needs is thoughtful. Application to future professional practice is insightful, innovative for the classroom setting, and expertly demonstrates growth and development as a professional. The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. Comments Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. Points Earned ECE 465 Clinical Field Experience Discussion