Factors that Influence Obesity Related Behaviours
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON Factors that Influence Obesity Related Behaviours
e fact that when they were using the framework method outlined, the data was read and coded inductively and then deductively using the Theoretical Domains Framework, where specific themes and codes were categorized according to the related domain. Part B: Do(es) the researcher(s) paint a clear picture of the participants’ reality? Answer: We can clearly say that yes, the researchers were able to paint a clear picture of the participants’ reality. This can be proven because if you read the article, the questions used in Appendix A topic guide uses Knowledge, Behavioral regulation, Memory, attention, and decision processes to prompt for further exploration of the nurses and health care team perception of pressure ulcers and how to prevent them. This article clearly states the reality of what the participants experienced during the study. Part C: Is there evidence that the researcher’(s)’ interpretation captured the participants’ meaning? Answer: We concluded that yes, there is evidence that the researchers’ interpretation captured the participants’ meaning during this study. While using the Theoretical Domain framework to find the barriers between hospital acquired pressure ulcers and how multidisciplinary teams can stop the formation, researchers placed an example of participants’ feedback to each point during the sample capturing their own meaning. Part D: Have other professionals confirmed the researcher’(s)’ interpretation? Answer: There is some evidence, but little information in this article to support this statement. Meaning, the author who helped write the article as well as performed the interview previously worked in the healthcare field as an assistant or a nurse and had experienced conducting wound care and qualitative research. This is beneficial to the study; however, no further information was given on confirmation, so it is hard to conclude how much input other professionals have given or have on the researchers’ interpretation. Question 7: Describing the findings QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 5 Part A: Are examples provided to guide the reader from the raw data to the researcher’(s)’ interpretation? Answer: While analyzing the article, we discovered that only during the introduction were examples used and was only used to distinguish between avoidable and unavoidable pressure ulcers and regarded the majority as avoidable when the correct preventative measures are used. There are currently several national and international clinical guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers. These guidelines draw on both research findings and expert opinion and recommend a range of activities and interventions to promote pressure ulcer prevention including risk assessment, skin assessment, repositioning, good hydration and nutrition, pressure redistributing devices and barrier creams. Factors that Influence Obesity Related Behaviours
This example is important to include as raw data to give a baseline of how the research is about to be conducted. With this being said, you can see that there were some examples that were used to guide the reader from the raw data to the researcher’s interpretation. These examples are very beneficial to provide support for this study; however, this was only the case in the beginning of the study during the introduction phase. It would be beneficial if the article included additional examples throughout the entire study as well. Overall, the examples that were included were in fact very sufficient in our opinion. Part B: Do(es) the researcher(s) link the findings to existing theory or literature, or is a new theory generated? Answer: If we look at whether this can be linked to an existing theory or literature or if a new theory is generated, we must think about what we already know about pressure ulcer formation and prevention. Most people understand ways to prevent pressure ulcers such as frequent repositioning, using barrier cream, etc. Not much new information was obtained in our opinion relating to a new theory of how pressure ulcers are either formed or barriers to prevent them. The information that was obtained such as barriers (knowledge, physical skills, social influences, and environmental context) and facilitators (interpersonal skills, environmental context and resources, social influences, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, and social identity) is not new in regard to pressure ulcer formation or prevention. With that being said, we can accurately say that the researcher did not link the findings to a new theory, but instead just re-instated facts and was able to prove them through the findings of this study. Question 8: Discussion/Interpretation of findings Part A: Does the discussion “fit” with the data? Is it logical based on the data and results presented? Answer: During the discussion section of this qualitative study, several things can be concluded. Overall, this study mainly focused on exploring the pressure ulcer prevention within the nursing home setting. It also focuses on discussing the findings. In this case; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 6 barriers and facilitators to evidence informed pressure ulcer prevention, which were identified throughout the entirety of the study. When we ask ourselves if the discussion “fits” with the data. We can say yes. Factors that Influence Obesity Related Behaviours
The information provided in the discussion section is very logical based on the results and data that was presented. If we wanted to go into more detail, first off, we will discuss the barriers. As an example, the four most common barriers we can discuss include knowledge, physical skills, social influences and environmental context and resources. Overall, the staff showed a high level of interest in improving knowledge and skills in pressure ulcer formation, however the knowledge they already had appeared to me limited. Views differed dramatically throughout the staff which is a problem. We also learned how the nursing home itself can be a barrier due to understaffing. This is likely to impact the quality of care for the patients. This is just one example. There are multiple factors discussed that relate to barriers. In addition, facilitators are also a factor that “fits” with the data and results presented. One example is teamwork and effective communication that are reported as facilitators for pressure ulcer prevention. With the information we are being presented in the discussion, we can say that yes, the discussion does fit with the data and results that we are presented in this study. Part B: Do(es) the researcher(s) discuss the findings in regard to previous research? Do(es) the researcher(s) discuss the findings in regard to a theoretical framework or structure of ideas? Answer: When we look at this study and its findings, the researchers do touch briefly on previous research related to this specific topic. They state how existing lit erature and studies report that staff attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention is equivocal. Factors that Influence Obesity Related Behaviours
They also touch on the fact that some studies report that staff have a lack of interest in pressure ulcer prevention and low motivation. This is important because it relates back to our barriers and facilitators we mentioned earlier in the study. This is not a new thing; however, it is still being talked about and re-studied due to lack of knowledge and compliance. Our researchers then mention how the findings in this study suggest that our positive attitudes in today’s age suggest that we may have a “fear of adverse consequences” (Lavallee et al., 2018). This is very interesting because in previous research this has not been identified as a possible facilitator as much as it has now. Overall, the researchers in this study do mention previous research and are able to accurately compare those results to the findings in this study. Our researchers also discuss the findings in regard to a theoretical framework. The Theoretical Domains Framework states how a person’s behavior can be affected by their beliefs about the consequences of a particular action (Lavallee et al., 2018). This is important because in this particular study all of the participants reported how they felt that within society pressure ulcers are a consequence of a lower quality of care. They then went on to explain their beliefs about what may happen if a patient developed a pressure ulcer under their care (Lavallee et al., 2018). Therefore, now all of the participants now have a positive attitude toward pressure ulcer prevention. With this information we are given we can accurately say that the researchers did in fact discuss our results in relation to a theoretical framework as well. Part C: Do(es) the researcher(s) identify limitations of the study? What are these QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 7 limitations? Do they affect the quality of the study? If so, how? Answer: The researchers in this study do identify limitations of this study. Many participants reported a lack of pressure ulcers in their patients during this study. This means that many nursing home staff that were participating may not have come from nursing homes that are representative in terms of health or quality care of their residents. All the staff that were recruited for this study came from different areas in North West England and different staffing grades were also recruited. There was also a small number of participating nursing homes which was a limitation to the research due to the small sample size. Also, the barriers may have been previously reported already as we mentioned earlier. Overall, we feel that a big limitation is the lack of motivation from the nursing home managers in regard to the research they were trying to conduct. All of these limitations affect the quality of the study given that there is limited participation, and lack of motivation. Since the findings may be interrelated to previous research this is also a limitation that affected the overall quality of the study. Part D: Are there limitations that the researcher(s) do(es) not identify? What are these limitations? Do they affect the quality of the study? If so, how? Factors that Influence Obesity Related Behaviours
Answer: There are usually always possible limitations that the researchers do not identify in our opinion. For example, there may be certain limitations due to time constraints, cultural bias’, and lack of knowledge about pressure ulcers that may impeded and affect the quality of the study. This was overall a pretty simple study to identify limitations for and the researcher did do an excellent job identifying them. Overall, the limitations in this study were very well laid out. Part E: Do(es) the researcher(s) discuss implications for practice? Are these appropriate? Answer: When we think about implications for practice, we are thinking simply about what our findings may mean for individuals that work in the healthcare field. In other words, how we are going to apply our findings to a clinical scenario. In this study, the researcher mentions several things that may be applied to real life scenarios as a result. After we look at the barriers and facilitators of pressure ulcer prevention and formation, the researcher has set a couple of goals that may be now applied: N … Factors that Influence Obesity Related Behaviours