Order Now
Item account not registered or doesn't have a view.php file.

GCU PSY 362 Topic 1 Benchmark Research Reflection

GCU PSY 362 Topic 1 Benchmark Research Reflection

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON GCU PSY 362 Topic 1 Benchmark Research Reflection

PSY 362 Topic 1 Benchmark Research Reflection GCU

Details:
Social competence is a complex concept consisting of social, emotional, cognitive, and behavioral skills. For example, one might change social interactions based on the situational perspective of another individual. Cultural competency enables organizations to work in cross-cultural situations based on skills, attitudes, behaviors, and policies. For example, it is important to provide health care services that meet the needs of all patients and addresses diversity issues.
In 500-750 words, address why social and cultural competency is critical in the research process. Be sure to address the following prompts:

  1. Define social and cultural competency
  2. Evaluate the importance of these concepts in terms of social psychological research.
  3. Give an example of a social psychological concept that can be understood from a cross-cultural perspective (e.g., social self, emotion, attitudes, fundamental attribution error)
  4. Why does cultural competency matter when researching a concept like the one you chose?
  5. Discuss problems that might occur if cross-cultural perspectives are neglected in the research. Be sure to share an example(s). Use two to three scholarly resources to support your explanations.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

References

Blackhart, G. C., Fitzpatrick, J., & Williamson, J. (2014). Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 113-118.

Bryant, K., & Sheldon, P. (2017). Cyber Dating in the Age of Mobile Apps: Understanding Motives, Attitudes, and Characteristics of Users. American Communication Journal, 19(2), 1.

Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(6), 1327.

Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. (2017). American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/.

Fullwood, C., & Attrill-Smith, A. (2018). Up-Dating: Ratings of Perceived Dating Success Are Better Online than Offline. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 21 (1), 11– 15.

Kopaczewski, S. (2017). Beyond Honest: Demanding Hyperauthentic Presentation in Online Dating. Proteus, 31(1), 11–20.

Manson, M. (2019, August 23). Attachment Theory. Retrieved from https://markmanson.net/attachment-theory.

Online dating statistics. (2018) <http://statisticbrain.com/online-dating-statistics/>.

Price, P. (2012). Research methods in psychology. Washington, D.C: Saylor Academy. Rosenberg, M. (1998). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton university press.