Health policy laws: KSA policy

You are tasked with assembling a Research Poster for the topic of how Vision 2030 progressed from agenda to policy in terms as it relates to tobacco and vaping use. Approach the situation as if you are gathering sources to present this research at a conference. Be sure your references address:

How tobacco and vaping concerns are indicated in Vision 2030.

What are some of the methods in obtaining research and data for shaping KSA policy regarding tobacco and vaping use?

Any challenges to collecting evidence-based information.

Health policy laws implementing positive social changes in this area of healthcare.

What is the importance of this information?

Why is your research topic relevant to your audience or field of study?

How is it applicable beyond these contexts?

For more information and an example of a Research Poster click here:

Poster Template 1

Poster Template 2

This Research Poster should meet the following criteria:

Include sections for: Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, and Conclusion. Include a title slide and references slide.

Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of three scholarly articles. The Saudi Digital Library is an excellent source for scholarly research. One of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures.

Be formatted according to APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University writing guidelines

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

HCM550 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module [4]

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Content Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Analysis Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides poor though, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

17-20 Points 13-16 Points: 9-12 Points 5-8 Points

Sources Sources go above and beyond required criteria and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

Mechanics and Writing

5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure, contains no errors in grammar, spelling,

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure, may include a few

Project is poorly organized and written and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development,

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations

HCM550 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module [4]

APA style, or APA citations and references.

minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style or APA citations and references.

and references.Health policy laws: KSA policy