Individuals With Self-Directed Support HW
Individuals With Self-Directed Support HW
1. Understand self-directed support;
1.1. Explain the principles underpinning self-directed support and how this differ from traditional support:
1.2. Explain the benefits of an individual having self-directed support:
1.3. Explain how legislation, policy or guidance underpin self-directed support:
1.4. Explain what the following terms mean:
A. Indicative allocation
b. Supported self-assessment
c. support plan
d. outcome focused review
1.5. Outline the possible barriers to self-directed support:
2. Understand how to support individuals to direct their own support and develop their support plan;
2.1. Explain how to use person-centred thinking to enable individuals to think about what is important to them, and how they want to be supported:
2.2. Explain how individuals can direct their own support if they do not have a personal budget:
2.3. Explain how person-centred planning can be used to inform a support plan:
2.4. Explain the roles of other who can assist individuals in developing their support plan:
2.5. Describe different ways that individuals can develop a support plan:
2.6. Describe a range of person-centred thinking tools that can be used to help individuals think about different ways they can spend their personal budget:
2.7. Describe what might be included in the costings for support plan:
3. Understand the different ways that individuals can use their personal budget;
3.1. Explain the different ways that individuals can use their personal budget to buy support:
3.2. Research innovative ways that individuals can spend their personal budget other than buying social care services:
3.3. Explain what restrictions may be imposed on personal budgets:
3.4. Describe the criteria that are used to sign off a support plan:
3.5. Describe a person-centred approach to risk that ensures that individuals have what is important to them whilst staying healthy and safe:
6. Be able to support individuals with an outcome-focused review:
6.1. Explain the process of an outcome-focused review:
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.