Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

To Prepare:

  • Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
  • Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
  • Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor. Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

The Assignment (3-4 Pages):

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
  • Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
  • Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

This was my discussion post:

Discussion: Review of current healthcare issues

Technology is one of the most critical issues in the healthcare sector. Over the past few decades, the healthcare sector has emerged intense pressure to embrace new communication, information processing, and treatment technologies. While this revolution has been gradual, the changes in information management practices have occurred swiftly. According to Agha (2014), information management technologies such as electronic health/medical records (EHR/EMR) have taken the healthcare sector by storm due to their potential to improve service delivery, quality of care, output, and overall reliability in the healthcare sector. Others, such as communication, have led to the emergence of telemedicine/telehealth that allows clinicians to assess, diagnose, prescribe, and monitor their patients remotely. While technology has created numerous opportunities in the healthcare sector, it has also raised multiple issues that need to be addressed for patients and hospitals to realize the optimum benefits. Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

The opportunities that arise from technology include quality improvement, cost reduction, increased productivity, and enhanced workflow, and improved patient safety. Technology not only allows clinicians to serve multiple patients simultaneously, but it also lowers the costs that patients incur as they visit hospitals, and the time that is wasted before service delivery (Agha, 2014; Mitchell & Kan, 2019). Healthcare services have thus become more efficient and reliable.

Unfortunately, technology threatens to worsen the existing healthcare disparities since new technologies and the necessary infrastructure are only available to the already privileged communities (Lee, 2015). For instance, patients with no access to computers, smartphones, and internet connectivity cannot access telemedicine. Further, the high implementation costs have limited the adoption of technology by hospitals by inadequately funded hospitals. However, the most significant concern is the effect of technology on the quality of care and patient safety. As cyber threats continue to threaten the safety of patient records and the integrity of healthcare services, some experts are concerned that ill-trained clinicians, faulty equipment, inaccurate data, and obsolete technologies, among others, could affect the quality of care (Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Chiumente & Dauben, 2017). The threat is worsened by the fast pace in which technologies become obsolete and the sharing of data across an entire healthcare facility or system. At the same time, a minor glitch could disrupt all essential healthcare services.

A lot needs to be done to address the issues above. First, the government and other stakeholders should invest heavily in providing basic services such as internet connectivity to the people and reducing the gap that already exists in this area. Additionally, the government, hospitals, learning institutions, and other stakeholders should invest heavily in research and development to raise the reliability of healthcare technologies and their relevance to the needs of the patients. This commitment should also focus on identifying and developing solutions to threats. Hospitals should be prepared to incur considerable costs in implementing healthcare technologies. While it is costly to invest in healthcare technologies, the long-term operating costs, increased productivity, and other saved costs raise the sustainability of technologies and their return on investment (Mitchell & Kan, 2019). Finally, healthcare professionals should be trained before they are introduced to new technologies, while they should also be required to update their knowledge and skills on a frequent basis.

 

References

Agha L. (2014). The effects of health information technology on the costs and quality of medical care. Journal of health economics34, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.12.005

Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I., Chiumente, M., & Dauben, H. P. (2017). The Life Cycle of Health Technologies. Challenges and Ways Forward. Frontiers in pharmacology8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00014

Lee J. (2015). The impact of health information technology on disparity of process of care. International journal for equity in health14, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0161-3

Mitchell, M., & Kan, L. (January 01, 2019). Digital Technology and the Future of Health Systems. Health Systems and Reform, 5, 2, 113-120. Doi. 10.1080/23288604.2019.1583040

Feedback:

Technology in health care helps contribute to patient-centered care by encouraging communication among providers and patients through online entries, text messaging, and email. It likewise builds access to data, for example, online medical records, which can develop self-checking and patient convenience. Technology has put at the disposal of the healthcare community different intense instruments to improve patient care. Since EHRs are effectively accessible to doctors, they can access complete medical histories of patients and settle on the most well-considered medical decisions.

Health Information Technology (HIT) is the backbone of the healthcare universe. Specialists, managers, nurses, and a range of healthcare professionals across fields seek to this function for significant to important patient information that can be made accessible immediately. Health Information Technology professionals make this possible (Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Chiumente & Dauben, 2017).

I work in a hospital, in ICU, and we use Cerner, which is exceptionally valuable. Cerner, a worldwide health platform and innovation company, and GetWellNetwork, a worldwide consumer health technology company, are collaborating to connect gaps among providers and patients from inpatient to outpatient settings (Clavelle, Sweeney, et al., 2019).

The combination will empower care teams to connect with patients before and after admission through automated check-ins, distinguish who needs help in near-real-time and proactively intervene before complications and additional costs arise. I was reading about GetWellNetwork, and it has served the inpatient space for 20 years. For some, care delivered in the hospital is still a critical event to demonstrate quality and convey excellently (Clavelle, Sweeney, et al., 2019).

References

Clavelle JT, Sweeney CD, Swartwout E, Lefton C, Senem G. Leveraging technology to sustain extraordinary care A qualitative analysis of meaningful nurse recognition. The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2019;49(6):303-309.

Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I., Chiumente, M., & Dauben, H. P. (2017). The Life Cycle of Health Technologies. Challenges and Ways Forward. Frontiers in pharmacology8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00014

Technology has changed the way professionals in the industry approach the idea of healthcare “Electronic health information systems (EHIS) are integrated, computer-assisted systems that are able to collect, store, and organize comprehensive patient information” (World Health Organization., 2005). As the use of Electronic Health Record systems continue to rise and replace traditional paper medical records with electronic documentation tools.

While many of these innovations make patient care easier and make traditional treatments more effective, they also present some unique challenges such as data entry errors. For example, computer bugs to cyber-attacks that can render the system inoperative or cause functional errors, some with serious consequences. “Cyber violence has especially become rampant in recent years, affecting numerous hospitals… Cyberattacks include a variety of threats from brute force and Denial-of-Service attacks to the use of phishing and malware or social engineering methods to compromise security” (Salem T. Argaw, et al., 2019).

One possible solution to a technology issue its be organized. A major problem for people who see numerous errors slipping by in their data entry process is that they simply do not have great organizational skills implemented. Your job will be more organized using digital folders and electronic filing.

References

Salem T. Argaw, Nefti-Eboni Bempong, Bruce Eshaya-Chauvin, & Antoine Flahault. (2019). The state of research on cyberattacks against hospitals and available best practice recommendations: a scoping review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 1, 1. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0724-5

World Health Organization. (2005). Bulletin of the World Health Organization (BLT), 83(8), (p.p.561–640

I enjoyed reading your post. Technology in health care helps contribute to patient-centered care by encouraging communication among providers and patients through online entries, text messaging, and email. It likewise builds access to data, for example, online medical records, which can develop self-checking and patient convenience. Technology has put at the disposal of the healthcare community different intense instruments to improve patient care. Since EHRs are effectively accessible to doctors, they can access complete medical histories of patients and settle on the most well-considered medical decisions.

Health Information Technology (HIT) is the backbone of the healthcare universe. Specialists, managers, nurses, and a range of healthcare professionals across fields seek to this function for significant to important patient information that can be made accessible immediately. Health Information Technology professionals make this possible (Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Chiumente & Dauben, 2017).

I work in a hospital, in ICU, and we use Cerner, which is exceptionally valuable. Cerner, a worldwide health platform and innovation company, and GetWellNetwork, a worldwide consumer health technology company, are collaborating to connect gaps among providers and patients from inpatient to outpatient settings (Clavelle, Sweeney, et al., 2019).

The combination will empower care teams to connect with patients before and after admission through automated check-ins, distinguish who needs help in near-real-time and proactively intervene before complications and additional costs arise. I was reading about GetWellNetwork, and it has served the inpatient space for 20 years. For some, care delivered in the hospital is still a critical event to demonstrate quality and convey excellently (Clavelle, Sweeney, et al., 2019).

References

Clavelle JT, Sweeney CD, Swartwout E, Lefton C, Senem G. Leveraging technology to sustain extraordinary care A qualitative analysis of meaningful nurse recognition. The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2019;49(6):303-309.

Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I., Chiumente, M., & Dauben, H. P. (2017). The Life Cycle of Health Technologies. Challenges and Ways Forward. Frontiers in pharmacology8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00014

Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

DEVELOP A 3- TO 4-PAGE PAPER, WRITTEN TO YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LEADERSHIP TEAM, ADDRESSING THE SELECTED NATIONAL HEALTHCARE ISSUE/STRESSOR AND HOW IT IS IMPACTING YOUR WORK SETTING. BE SURE TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:

· DESCRIBE THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE ISSUE/STRESSOR YOU SELECTED AND ITS IMPACT ON YOUR ORGANIZATION. USE ORGANIZATIONAL DATA TO QUANTIFY THE IMPACT (IF NECESSARY, SEEK ASSISTANCE FROM LEADERSHIP OR APPROPRIATE STAKEHOLDERS IN YOUR ORGANIZATION).

 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague or inaccurate.

The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected, or is missing.

· PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE TWO ARTICLES YOU REVIEWED FROM OUTSIDE RESOURCES, ON THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE ISSUE/STRESSOR AND EXPLAIN HOW THE HEALTHCARE ISSUE/STRESSOR IS BEING ADDRESSED IN OTHER ORGANIZATIONS.

 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that fully support the summary provided. Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that may support the summary provided.

The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations that is vague or inaccurate.

 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided, or is missing.

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.

· SUMMARIZE THE STRATEGIES USED TO ADDRESS THE ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACT OF NATIONAL HEALTHCARE ISSUES/STRESSORS PRESENTED IN THE SCHOLARLY RESOURCES YOU SELECTED AND EXPLAIN HOW THEY MAY IMPACT YOUR ORGANIZATION BOTH POSITIVELY AND NEGATIVELY. BE SPECIFIC AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES.

 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)A complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples.

 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. May include some specific examples.

 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague or inaccurate. May include some vague or inaccurate examples.

 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided, or is missing.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Does not include any examples.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING – PARAGRAPH DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION:

PARAGRAPHS MAKE CLEAR POINTS THAT SUPPORT WELL-DEVELOPED IDEAS, FLOW LOGICALLY, AND DEMONSTRATE CONTINUITY OF IDEAS. SENTENCES ARE CAREFULLY FOCUSED—NEITHER LONG AND RAMBLING NOR SHORT AND LACKING SUBSTANCE. A CLEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE PURPOSE STATEMENT AND INTRODUCTION IS PROVIDED WHICH DELINEATES ALL REQUIRED CRITERIA.

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING – ENGLISH WRITING STANDARDS:

CORRECT GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, AND PROPER PUNCTUATION

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Leadership Analysis of A Pertinent Healthcare Issue

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING – THE PAPER FOLLOWS CORRECT APA FORMAT FOR TITLE PAGE, HEADINGS, FONT, SPACING, MARGINS, INDENTATIONS, PAGE NUMBERS, PARENTHETICAL/IN-TEXT CITATIONS, AND REFERENCE LIST.

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%