Order Now
Item account not registered or doesn't have a view.php file.

MN 503 Searching for Data in PubMed Discussion.

MN 503 Searching for Data in PubMed Discussion.

MN 503 Searching for Data in PubMed Discussion.

 

Describe three unique features of PubMed database that sets this database apart from other evidence-based search engines.

Compare and contrast two additional databases and reference your selected topic, by using the Cochrane Collaboration and Medline as your search engines.

Determine how you applied the three key questions when deciding which database to use.

******

Boolean Operators and Systematic Reviews

You will tackle the methods of locating evidence, learning to develop systematic reviews of the literature that will help build your evidence for your particular PICOT question. You will be able to determine what the top three questions are that you must ask to develop your systematic review of the literature and database for a robust report on the evidence you seek

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

.

PubMed Database Overview

PubMed is a broad database that is used by clinicians internationally. This resource is invaluable to nurses since there are more than 19 million citations to articles that cover many areas of practice. You will learn to use this reliable free source of evidence.

Determining Key Questions for Systematic Reviews

You will have the opportunity to use key questions to search the literature database. For example, once you have decided on your PICOT question (i.e., is acetaminophen better for reducing children’s fevers than acetaminophen?), then you will learn how to plug that question into a database to deliver a systematic review of reliable evidence for your research.

Plan a Systematic Review

As you determine your key questions for the systematic review you will then have the opportunity to plan a systematic review, determining which database and search method you will use. This step is the step that helps you strategize where and how you will enter your clinical questions to have reliable research results. For example, you may decide that you will use PubMed and the Boolean term of AND for your search terms.

After completing this unit, you should be able to:

  • Choose between Boolean operators and ʺlimitsʺ when conducting systematic reviews.
  • Describe three unique features of the PubMed database.
  • Apply three key questions to be used when deciding which database to use for information search.
  • Plan a systematic review.

 

UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Rubric Title: MSN 30 point Discussion Rubric Criteria 1 Level III Max Points Points: 6 Identification (20%) ● Thorough identification of the importance of the subject matter to the individual, clinical, and professional. ● Supports discussion concepts through personal experience and evidence-based information. ● Submits a minimum of three posts, one initial and two responses to either the course faculty or peers, with thorough reflection Level II Max Points Points: 4.8 ● Reflection of subject to self, clinical, and professional importance with minimal integration of evidence-based information. ● Submits two or more posts with some reflection and content. Level I Max Points Points: 3.6 ● Minimal reflection without reference to personal, clinical, or profession. ● Submits one or more posts that have minimal reflection or content. Not Present 0 Points No Posts and content. Criteria 2 Level III Max Points Points: 18 Reflection/Participation/ Knowledge (60%) ● Provides a wellwritten reflection that is clearly connected to the outcomes and clinical insight. ● Responds to at least two other student postings with a response that advances the discussion. ● Clear critical thinking acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. ● Replies move the conversation forward. Makes a reply to a question asked in response Level II Max Points Points: 14.4 ● Provides a wellwritten reflection and there is a clear connection to outcomes, but lacks clinical insight. ● Replies partially move the conversation forward. Makes a reply to question asked in response to their own posting. ● Some clear critical thinking acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. ● Affirms statements or references to relevant research. Level I Max Points Points: 10.8 ● Provides short reflection and there is a slight connection to outcomes. ● Student does not move the conversation forward within their own post or in their response to peer/faculty. ● Minimal critical thinking that acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. ● Does not affirm or oppose statements in conversation. ● Does not pose or ask related Not Present 0 Points No Posts to their own posting. ● Builds a focused argument. ● Asks new or related questions. ● Makes an oppositional or congruent statement that is supported by experience or research. ● Asks similar or related questions within the context of the conversation. Criteria 3 Level III Max Points Points: 6 Level II Max Points Points: 4.8 Format/Style/APA/ Citations (20%) ● No grammar, word usage, or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. ● Writing style facilitates communication. ● Provides three references that are ● Fewer than three grammatical errors. ● Provides less than three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years. ● Writing style facilitates some communication. question in the context of DB conversation. Level I Max Points Points: 3.6 ● More than three grammatical errors. ● Provides less than three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years. ● Writing style does not facilitate communication. Not Present 0 Points No Posts relevant to the content and published within the last five years. Maximum Total Points 30 24 18 0 Minimum Total Points 25 points minimum 19 points minimum 1 point minimum 0 Updated 9/4/2020MN 503 Searching for Data in PubMed Discussion.