NR512 Week 5 Rubric
NR512 Week 5 Rubric
* APA 7, Scholarly references 2017-2021 only
5 pages only
Follow instructions and rubric
Visit the following site http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/it (Links to an external site.)
Preparing the paper
1. The FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT Current/Popular Topic of the Week assignment must be a professional, scholarly prepared paper. See the guidelines for writing a professional, scholarly paper. The professional paper will have an introduction, body of paper to explain what you are doing, summary/conclusion, and at least three scholarly references.
2. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside of course readings.
3. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the current edition.
4. The paper (excluding the title page, introduction and reference page) is 4-6 pages in length.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing.
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
Introduction |
20 pts
Introduction presents a brief overview all parts of the paper. |
18 pts
Introduction presents one of the two required elements. |
16 pts
Introduction does not include either of the two required elements. |
14 pts
Minimal attempt at introduction. |
0 pts
No introduction is present. |
|
20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic NR512 Week 5 Rubric |
30 pts
Successfully selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic |
26 pts
Selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic |
24 pts
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic |
11 pts
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides no rationale for selecting topic |
0 pts
Does not complete assignment |
|
30 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConvincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner citing pros and cons |
40 pts
Provides convincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented. |
36 pts
Some arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented, but are not convincing in nature. |
32 pts
Minimal arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented. |
0 pts
No discussion of positive or negative impact presented |
|
40 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment |
30 pts
Discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment is presented |
26 pts
Some discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. |
24 pts
Minimal discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used presented |
0 pts
No discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used |
|
30 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion |
20 pts
Concluding statements summarize insights about the key elements of the paper gained during the assignment. Recommendations for the future are provided |
18 pts
Provides a summary of key points and a partial summary of insights gained during the assignment. Includes some recommendations for future related to topic. |
16 pts
Concluding statements are present but do not address insights and/or includes minimal recommendations for future related to topic |
14 pts
Minimal concluding statements present but no insight or recommendations for future are presented. |
0 pts
No conclusion. |
|
20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style |
20 pts
0–1 APA format errors in text, title, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
18 pts
2-3 APA format errors in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
16 pts
4-6 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
14 pts
7-9 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format |
0 pts
10 or more APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
|
20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations |
8 pts
0–1 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited correctly. There are a minimum of three scholarly, current (5 years or less) references. |
7 pts
2-3 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited. |
6 pts
4-6 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited. |
4 pts
7-9 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited. |
0 pts
10 or more errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited |
|
8 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics |
7 pts
0–3 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing |
6 pts
4–5 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing |
5 pts
6-7 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing |
3 pts
8-9 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing |
0 pts
10 or more errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing. |
|
7 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction |
0 pts
0 pts lost – submission met deadline |
0 pts
student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days) |
|