NRS 493 Prevention of Rise in Dialysis Patients

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” (attached) determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The PICOT question is Among illegal immigrants, how can sanctuary doctoring, compared to regular service delivery, help patients to open up to doctors during the treatment period?

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Literature Evaluation Table Student Name: Change Topic (2-3 sentences): Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project © 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Article 4 Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone © 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Article 8 Course Code NRS-493 Class Code NRS-493-O502 Criteria Content Percentage 100.0% Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article 5.0% Article Title and Year Published 5.0% Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study 10.0% Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) 5.0% Setting or Sample 5.0% Methods: Intervention or Instruments 5.0% Analysis 10.0% Key Findings 10.0% Recommendations 10.0% Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone 10.0% Presentation 10.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style 5.0% Total NRS 493 Prevention of Rise in Dialysis Patients

Weightage 100% Assignment Title Literature Evaluation Table 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. Article title and year published section is not included. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included. Setting or sample section is not included. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is not included. Analysis section is not included. Key findings section is not included. Recommendations section is not included. Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included. The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Sources are not documented. Total Points 50.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present. Article title and year published section is present. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present. Setting or sample section is present. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present NRS 493 Prevention of Rise in Dialysis Patients