NURS 60501 Presidential Agendas on Health Discussion

Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric Grid View Main Posting EXIT List View Excellent Good Fair Poor 45 (45%) – 50 40 (40%) – 44 35 (35%) – 39 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with re!ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is re!ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. (39%) One or two criteria are not addressed or are super”cially addressed. Is somewhat lacking re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Supported by at least three credible sources. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or Post is cited with two credible sources. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 Lacks depth or super”cially addresses criteria. Lacks re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written Page 1 of 4 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3. Posts main post by day 3.

First Response clearly or concisely. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Page 2 of 4 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. or no credible sources are cited. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Page 3 of 4 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

written in standard, edited English. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 di#erent days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric EXIT https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 Page 4 of 4 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric Grid View Main Posting EXIT List View Excellent Good Fair Poor 45 (45%) – 50 40 (40%) – 44 35 (35%) – 39 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with re!ective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is re!ective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. (39%) One or two criteria are not addressed or are super”cially addressed. Is somewhat lacking re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Supported by at least three credible sources. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or Post is cited with two credible sources. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 Lacks depth or super”cially addresses criteria. Lacks re!ection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written Page 1 of 4 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3. Posts main post by day 3. First Response clearly or concisely. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Page 2 of 4 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. credible sources. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. or no credible sources are cited. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is e#ectively 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. NURS 60501 Presidential Agendas on Health Discussion

Responses posted in the discussion may lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack e#ective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Page 3 of 4 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn 6/2/21, 7:55 PM synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. NURS 60501 Presidential Agendas on Health Discussion

written in standard, edited English. Response is e#ectively written in standard, edited English. Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three di#erent days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 di#erent days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric EXIT https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16846406_1&rubric_id=_2407946_1 Page 4 of 4