NURS 6521N Week 9 Women’s and Men’s Health Infections
NURS 6521N Week 9 Women’s and Men’s Health Infections
Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/Infections and Hematologic Systems, Part I
As an advanced practice nurse, you will likely encounter many disorders associated with women’s and men’s health, such as hormone deficiencies, cancers, and other functional and structural abnormalities. Disorders such as these not only result in physiological consequences but also psychological consequences, such as embarrassment, guilt, or profound disappointment for patients. For these reasons, the provider-patient relationship must be carefully managed. During evaluations, patients must feel comfortable answering questions so that you, as a key health-care provider, will be able to diagnose and recommend appropriate treatment options. Advanced practice nurses must be able to educate patients on these disorders and help relieve associated stigmas and concerns.
This week, you examine women’s and men’s health concerns as well as the types of drugs used to treat disorders that affect women’s and men’s health. You also explore how to treat aspects of these disorders on other health systems. NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Evaluate patients for treatment of complex health issues
- Evaluate patients for treatment of infections
- Evaluate patients for treatment of hematologic disorders
- Analyze patient education strategies for the management and treatment of complex comorbidities
Learning Resources – NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections
Discussion: Women’s and Men’s Health, Infectious Disease, and Hematologic Disorders
As an advanced practice nurse, you will likely experience patient encounters with complex comorbidities. For example, consider a female patient who is pregnant who also presents with hypertension, diabetes, and has a recent tuberculosis infection. How might the underlying pathophysiology of these conditions affect the pharmacotherapeutics you might recommend to help address your patient’s health needs? What education strategies might you recommend for ensuring positive patient health outcomes?
For this Discussion, you will be assigned a patient case study and will consider how to address the patient’s current drug therapy plans. You will then suggest recommendations on how to revise these drug therapy plans to ensure effective, safe, and quality patient care for positive patient health outcomes. NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections
Photo Credit: Getty Images
To Prepare
- Review the Resources for this module and reflect on the different health needs and body systems presented.
- Your Instructor will assign you a complex case study to focus on for this Discussion.
- Consider how you will practice critical decision making for prescribing appropriate drugs and treatment to address the complex patient health needs in the patient case study you selected.
By Day 3 of Week 9
Post a brief description of your patient’s health needs from the patient case study you assigned. Be specific. Then, explain the type of treatment regimen you would recommend for treating your patient, including the choice or pharmacotherapeutics you would recommend and explain why. Be sure to justify your response. Explain a patient education strategy you might recommend for assisting your patient with the management of their health needs. Be specific and provide examples.
You will respond to your colleagues’ posts in Week 10.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Example Discussion
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common, incurable illness that is associated with a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. It is the third leading cause of death in the United States and is one of the most frequently comorbid conditions in patients with pneumonia Restrepo, Sibila, & Anzueto, 2018).
The patient in this case study is a 68 year old male who has presented with community acquired pneumonia for the past 3 days. His past medical history includes COPD, HTN, HLD and DM. He is taking ceftriaxone 1g IV daily and azithromycin 500 mg IV daily. The gentleman is improving and requiring less oxygen; however, he is not tolerating his diet and complains of nausea and vomiting.
Since this patient is already on antibiotics I would continue their prescribed course. This patient would also require respiratory treatments. I would have the patient on a regimen of Albuterol, Arformoterol, and Budesonide. Albuterol provides quick relief for the bronchospasms caused by COPD. Since Albuterol is a short acting medication, I would prescribe 2.5 mg inhaled, 4 times a day. The Arformoterol is a long acting bronchodilator. I would have the patient on 15 mcg q12 hours. Finally, Budesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid that will aid in the reduction of lung inflammation. I would prescribe 0.5 mg of this drug twice a day (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2018). I would also order IV Methylprednisolone 125 mg for the first 3 days of his hospitalization and then taper to oral prednisone (Li, 2004). Methylprednisolone works by reducing shortness of breath by decreasing inflammation in the bronchial tubes (Bishop, 2010). Patients with COPD who are suffering from an exacerbation or pneumonia, have been shown to have shorter hospital stays and better treatment outcomes when given corticosteroids. Although, Methylprednisolone has many benefits, it does cause hyperglycemia. Since this patient is already a diabetic, it will be important for him to have his blood glucose monitored before meals and at bed time; and be prescribed sliding scale insulin for glucose control (Li, 2004). NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections
Often patients with pneumonia need assistance with coughing up mucus from the lungs. It may be beneficial for the patient to be prescribed an expectorant, such as Guaifenesin, 200mg q12 hours. It is unclear why the patient has nausea and vomiting. It could be from his course of antibiotics or a side effect from corticosteroids. Therefore, I would provide supportive care with ondansetron 4 mg IV q6 PRN (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2018).
This gentleman will need education on managing his health care needs. The first thing I would offer this patient is smoking cessation. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is typically caused by smoking; and people with COPD are at a much higher risk of acquiring pneumonia (Gotter, 2018). If this patient is smoking, it would be imperative that he quits. If this patient is to be discharged with an oral steroid, it will be important that he carefully monitors his blood sugar, as steroids cause hyperglycemia (Li, 2004). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and pneumonia are both in the top ten leading causes of death in the United States. The lungs of patients with COPD are exposed to more pathogens and are thereby at an increased risk for pneumonia (Restrepo, Sibila, & Anzueto, 2018). This patient will need to be educated on the signs and symptoms of hypoxia and be informed on the importance of receiving their flu shot and pneumonia vaccine to assist in preventing further cases of pneumonia (Bishop, 2010).
As Advanced Practice Nurses, we will be responsible for caring for patients with a variety of comorbid conditions. It will be important that we consider all of our patients illnesses before prescribing a course of treatment. It will be vital for us to empower our patients with the education they need to better manage their health care and disease processes.
Bishop, S. (2010). Methylprednisolone may relieve shortness of breath, but won’t treat Emphysema.https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/methylprednisolone-may relieve-shortness-of-breath-but-wont-treat-emphysema/
Gotter, A. (2018). What at the risks of having COPD and pneumonia? https://www.healthline.com/health/copd/copd-and-pneumonia-understanding-your-risk
Li, J. (2004). Recommended dose of IV corticosteroids for COPD exacerbation? https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/468134
Restrepo, M.I., Sibila, O., Anzueto, A. (2018). Pneumonia in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, 81(3), 187-197. doi: 10.4046/trd/2018/0030.
Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2018). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice providers. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 9 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 9 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 10
To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 9 Discussion
Rubric Detail – NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6521_Week9_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources. NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. .
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. .
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6521_Week9_Discussion_Rubric
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting |
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Main Post: Timeliness |
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3
|
First Response |
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. . Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. . Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Second Response |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. . Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. . Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. NURS 6521N Week 9: Women’s and Men’s Health/ Infections |
Participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|