Nursing Philosophy: Growth and evolution

Write a personal nursing philosophy reflecting growth and evolution during your tenure as a nursing student. This is a personal philosophy that prospective employers may be invited to see.

Submit a minimum of two paragraphs explaining your personal nursing philosophy. Include your view of health and your thoughts on your future role as a nurse.
Use APA Style.
Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: Rubric: Nursing Philosophy

	Meets or Exceeds Expectations	Mostly Meets Expectations	Below Expectations	Does Not Meet Expectations
Effects on Health	Points: Points Range: 20.25 (22.50%) – 22.5 (25.00%) The student provides a thoughtful, descriptive explanation of their beliefs on health. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 17.1 (19.00%) – 20.025 (22.25%) The student provides a general explanation of their beliefs on health. Details may be missing and some ideas expressed may be generic, popular opinion, or impersonal. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 13.5 (15.00%) – 16.875 (18.75%) The student provides a vague or unclear explanation of their beliefs on health. Details are missing and one does not get a sense of the student’s beliefs on health. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 13.275 (14.75%) The student does not provide personal beliefs on health. Feedback:
Personal Nursing Philosophy Content	Points: Points Range: 32.4 (36.00%) – 36 (40.00%) The student provides a thoughtful, descriptive personal nursing philosophy. The student includes multiple details to support their thoughts and reasons. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 27.36 (30.40%) – 32.04 (35.60%) The student provides a satisfactory, descriptive personal nursing philosophy but some ideas are underdeveloped or vague. The student includes minimal detail to support their thoughts and reasons. Ideas may be generic, popular opinion, or impersonal. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21.6 (24.00%) – 27 (30.00%) The student provides a vague or incoherent personal nursing philosophy. The student does not include details to support their thoughts and reasons. Ideas may be confusing or incomplete. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 21.24 (23.60%) The student does not include a personal nursing philosophy. Feedback:
Organization/Composition	Points: Points Range: 1.62 (1.80%) – 18 (20.00%) The assignment is organized in a clear, concise, formal, and well-organized manner. Writing is sophisticated and word choice is thoughtful and professional. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 13.68 (15.20%) – 16.02 (17.80%) Most of the writing is clear and organized, but there may be one or two instances where it is not. Most word choice is thoughtful and professional. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10.8 (12.00%) – 13.5 (15.00%) The writing lacks clarity, conciseness, and organization in many places. Some of the word choice does not reflect professionalism. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 10.62 (11.80%) The paper is unfocused or contains serious errors with organization. The paper lacks professionalism. Feedback:
APA Style and Mechanics	Points: Points Range: 12.15 (13.50%) – 13.5 (15.00%) The student uses APA Style accurately and consistently. The assignment meets all formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10.26 (11.40%) – 12.015 (13.35%) The students uses APA Style but there are 1–2 errors. The assignment meets most formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with only 3-4 errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 8.1 (9.00%) – 10.125 (11.25%) The student reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style and there are 3-4 errors. Teh assignment meets half of the formatting requirements (length and style). Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the assignment. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 7.965 (8.85%) Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. No attempt to follow the required format is indicated. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. Feedback: