Nursing Roles Discussion

Course Code NUR-513 Class Code NUR-513-O500 Criteria Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Criteria Percentage 100.0% Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics 10.0% Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education 10.0% Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership 10.0% Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health 10.0% Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration 10.0% Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics 10.0% Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance 10.0% Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty 5.0% Required Sources 5.0% Visual Appeal 5.0% Presentation 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to education is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to public health is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is not included. Nursing Roles Discussion

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is not included. Sources are not included. There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident. The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Sources are not documented. Total Points 120.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to education is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Nursing Roles Discussion

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Number of required sources is only partially met. Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (88.00%) A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present. A comparison of roles in relation to education is present. A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present. A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present. A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present. A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present. A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present. A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (92.00%) A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is clearly provided and well developed. Nursing Roles Discussion

A comparison of roles in relation to education is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of roles in relation to public health is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is clearly provided and well developed. A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is clearly provided and well developed. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. Nursing Roles Discussion

The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to ethics is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to education is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to leadership is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to public health is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Nursing Roles Discussion

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to informatics is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Comments A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to specialty is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. Nursing Roles Discussion

The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template Observations (Similarities/Differences) Ethics Education Leadership Public Health Health Care Administration Informatics © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Business/Finance Specialty (e.g., Family, Acute Care) Regulatory Bodies or Certification Agencies That Provide Guidance or Parameters on How These Roles Incorporate Concepts Into Practice © 2013. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. … Nursing Roles Discussion