Nursing Scholarly Article Critique Paper

SCHOLARLY ARTICLE CRITIQUE PAPER (35% of final grade) DUE DATE: November 9th, 2019 GUIDELINES: Each STUDENT will hand in one formal paper. The paper is to be a five (5) pages total (double-spaced, 12 font, 1 inch margins). Follow APA guidelines for a cover sheet, headers, pagination, references, etc. Use APA format and label each section using the evaluation outline below. The criteria guidelines below will be used to evaluate your paper. Components of the Paper and possible points SECTION Analysis of basic components/concepts of the selected theory. • Discuss in detail the theory’s core concepts and/or components • Use a secondary source like your textbook or scholarly article that details the selected nursing theory. Application to Research and Practice •

• Select two peerreviewed/practicebased articles in which the same theory has been applied to clinical patient care issues (i.e. multiple sclerosis, CHF, etc.). Describe the key details of each article (purpose, sample size, methodology, interventions, results, future implications, strengths & limitations). POINTS POSSIBLE 15 15 • Critically analyze and summarize how the research results can be applied to primary care and improve care rendered by the family nurse practitioner. Format 5 • Precise APA style, headers and pagination, references, proper use of grammar/spelling, etc.

Total 35 Research Paper Rubric Integration of Knowledge Outstanding (35) Very Good (33) Good (30) Unacceptable (25) The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course. Nursing Scholarly Article Critique Paper

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment. The topic is not clearly defined The writer has omitted Cursory discussion in all Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas Topic Focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis Depth of Discussion In-depth discussion and Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position. In-depth discussion and Cohesiveness elaboration in all sections of the paper. elaboration in pertinent most sections of content. the paper. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections Ties together information from all sources. For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Does not tie together information. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Author’s Author’s writing writing demonstrates an demonstrates an understanding understanding of the of the relationship relationship among material among material obtained from obtained from all sources. all sources Author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Spelling and Grammar Minimal spelling and/or grammar mistakes Some spelling and or grammar mistakes.

Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer review journal articles or scholarly 5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peerreviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peerreviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationship books. Nursing Scholarly Article Critique Paper

Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. All web sites utilized are authoritative. sites utilized are web sites credible. utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. Cites most data obtained from other sources. Cites some data obtained from other sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative. Citations Cites all data obtained from other sources. Does not cite sources. …