Obesity Intervention Plan for People with Diabetes Paper.

guidance to help you successfully complete the Intervention Plan Design assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise, an outlining tool, or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment. Do not turn in this document as your assessment submission. Part 1: Intervention Plan Components Define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

• What are the major components of your intervention plan? • How will these components lead to improvements related to your identified need? • Why are these components the best option to address your identified need? Explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components. • • What are the cultural needs and characteristics of your target population for this project?

o How will the cultural needs of the population impact the development of your intervention plan components? o What aspects of the target population’s cultural characteristics impact the development of your intervention plan components? What are the cultural needs and characteristics of your setting for this project? o How will the cultural needs of the setting impact the development of your intervention plan components? o What aspects of the setting’s cultural characteristics impact the development of your intervention plan components? Part 2: Theoretical Foundations Evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan. • What theoretical nursing models are relevant to your intervention plan?

o • Which of these models will most impact the design of the intervention plan components? What strategies from other disciplines are relevant to your intervention plan? o Which of these strategies will most impact the design of the intervention plan components? 1 • What health care technologies are relevant to your intervention plan? o Which of these technologies will most impact the design of the intervention plan components? Justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices.

• How will the theoretical nursing models you referenced help justify your design decisions regarding intervention plan components? • How will the strategies from other disciplines you referenced help justify your design decisions regarding intervention plan components? • How will the health care technologies you referenced help justify your design decisions regarding intervention plan components? Part 3 – Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations Analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan. • Who are the relevant stakeholders? o • What are the relevant health care policies? o • How will these health care policies impact your intervention plan components? What are the relevant health care regulations?

o • How will the needs of these stakeholders impact your intervention plan components? How will these health care regulations impact your intervention plan components? What are the relevant governing bodies? o How will these governing bodies impact your intervention plan components? Part 4 – Ethical and Legal Implications Analyze relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan. • • What are the relevant ethical issues related to your project? o How will these ethical issues affect the health care practice considerations that are relevant to your intervention plan? o How will these ethical issues affect any organizational change considerations that are relevant to your intervention plan? o How will these ethical issues affect one or more specific components of your intervention plan? What are the relevant legal issues related to your project? o How will these legal issues affect the health care practice considerations that are relevant to your intervention plan? 2 o How will these legal issues affect any organizational change considerations that are relevant to your intervention plan? o How will these legal issues affect one or more specific components of your intervention plan? Address Generally Throughout Communicate intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account. • Is your writing clear and professional?

• Does your writing effectively communicate you proposed intervention plan? • Does your writing effectively communicate how you will address the implications that you uncovered? • Is your writing free from errors? • Is your submission 4–6 pages? • Did you cite a minimum of 5–10 resources? (You may use resources previously cited in your literature review to contribute to this number.) • Does your submission conform to current APA style standards? 3 NONPERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Deﬁne the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need. Does not deﬁne the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need. Attempts to deﬁne the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need, but fails to clarify how components will lead to improvements or why they are the best option to address the need. Deﬁnes the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.

Deﬁnes the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need, and suggests criteria that could be used to evaluate the success of such a plan. Explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components. Does not explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components. Partially explains the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting, but omits some aspects or fails to make a logical connection to show how the cultural needs and characteristics will impact the development of intervention plan components. Explains the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components. Explains the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components, and identiﬁes assumptions on which the explanation is based. Evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan. Does not evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan. Attempts to evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies, but fails to show their relevance to the intervention plan. Evaluates theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan. Evaluates, identifying both strengths and weaknesses of, theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan. Justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices.

Does not justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices. Attempts to justify the major components of an intervention, but cited references lack relevance to the proposed intervention or are insufﬁcient to justify the plan. Justiﬁes the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices. Justiﬁes the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices, and impartially considers conﬂicting data and other perspectives. CRITERIA 1/2 CRITERIA NONPERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan. Does not analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan. Provides an incomplete or ﬂawed analysis of how stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, or governing bodies will affect the speciﬁc components of an intervention plan. Analyzes the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan. Analyzes the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan, and identiﬁes assumptions on which the analysis is based. Analyze relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan. Does not discuss relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan. Discusses ethical and legal issues, but fails to analyze their relationship to health care practice, organizational change, and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan. Analyzes relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan.

Analyzes relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and speciﬁc components of an intervention plan; identiﬁes knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the analysis). Communicate intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account. Does not communicate intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account.

Inconsistently communicates intervention plan in a way that partially helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account. Communicates intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account. Communicates intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account.

Grammar, punctuation, spelling, and citations are error-free. Demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience. Does not demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience. Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience, but provides no details about activities completed during those hours. Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience. Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience and provides a clear and concise description of the focus of the clinical hours and alignment to the capstone

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Obesity Intervention Plan for People with Diabetes Paper.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Obesity Intervention Plan for People with Diabetes Paper.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Obesity Intervention Plan for People with Diabetes Paper.