Personality Disorder Scenario Discussion
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON Personality Disorder Scenario Discussion
I need to paraphrase this paper.
Introduction
Personality Disorders are a group of disorders that are characterized by the individual having “rigid and unhealthy patterns of thinking’(mayo clinic, n.d.). These pt. tend to have trouble dealing with every day stressors.(Sadock, Sadock, & Ruiz, 2014). About 10 to 20% of the world’s population have this disorder.(Sadock et al., 2014)
This paper will describe a scenario in a 32 y/o pt. named Rhonda who has a personality disorder.(Laureate Education, n.d.)
Case Scenario
Rhonda is a 32 y/o Hispanic female who presents to the office for mental health care. She states multiple life stressors, such as a recent break up with her boyfriend, whom she describes at the start of their relationship was nice to her but the relationship later soured. She states “I hate his guts!” (Laureate Education, n.d., para. 1). Rhonda describes having very few friends and feels like everyone has abandoned her.
She has been in jail many times for firearm offenses, and possession of controlled substances. fighting and also stealing. She also describes an incident where a friend offered to loan her money, backed out and Rhonda stole the money anyway.
Rhonda also describes being at “ the end of her rope”(Laureate Education, n.d.)
Decision 1
Based on the information provided I chose the diagnoses of Antisocial Personality Disorder. I selected this decision because people with APD due to the fact that Rhonda has been incarcerated , lacks respect for the rights of others , and she is also dramatic , erratic and emotional.(Sadock et al., 2014) This is also congruent with the DSM V criteria for APD . ( fighting, stealing, emotional and little respect for the rights of others)(DSM 5, 2017). I hoped to achieve and early accurate diagnoses, and treatment plan for Rhonda. Early diagnoses and psychotherapy will provide the pt. the best chance at living a normal life.(Sadock et al., 2014)
There was little difference in what I expected to happen and what did happen. My diagnoses fit with the DSM V criteria.
Decision 2
APD can be very challenging to diagnose, as the s/s mimic other personality disorders.(Sadock et al., 2014) Psychotherapy testing is actually considered one of the best diagnostic aids in APD. (Nelson-Gray, 2009). Also, there are limited treatment options, so with this in mind psychological testing would be in order.(Sadock et al., 2014)
So, I chose psychological testing for Rhonda. The difference between what I expected to happen and what did happen were that the testing did lean towards APD , and that Rhonda tolerated the amount of time that it took to administer the test. The other surprise that Rhonda was open to getting better and even though she wasn’t happy about she was willing to go on with treatment.
Decision 3
Psychological testing is to be used to zero in on the actual disorder that the pt. has to return to some semblance of normal functioning.(Nelson-Gray, 2009) Also, there are no FDA approved medications for the treatment of APD. (mayo clinic, n.d.). So, I chose the option of group CBT. Group CBT therapy has shown the greatest amount of success in managing the negative s/s of APD, while providing some coping skills. Dialectical behavior therapy(Sadock et al., 2014)
Ethical Considerations
About 10-20% of people suffer with APD, with this in mind it is also found that it carries a large risk of suicide. The ethical consideration would be to the provider to always assess for suicidal ideations and be ready to act in the best interest of the pt.(Sadock et al., 2014). To this end , communication with the families of friends of the pt. is vital for collateral information that the pt. may or may not share. This is done ultimately to keep the pt. safe.
References
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. (2017). http://dx.doi.org/Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 Full Access
Laureate Education. (n.d.). www.waldenu.edu
mayo clinic. (n.d.). www.mayoclinic.com
Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2009). Assessment and treatment of personality disorders : A behavioral perspective . Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100662
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Personality Disorder Scenario Discussion
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Personality Disorder Scenario Discussion
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Personality Disorder Scenario Discussion