Prescribed Drugs with CAMs

Assignment/Project Rubric Unit 9 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points = Content Rubric Content Quality Resources Introductory Emergent Practiced Proficient/Mastered 0 – 1.9 2 – 2.9 3 – 3.9 4 Submission does not address most of the assignment requirements and/or indicates no understanding of critical concepts. Includes some of the assignment requirements. Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of some critical concepts. Includes all assignment requirements with minor errors/omissions, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly. Displays understanding of most critical concepts. Does not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1). Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources. Prescribed Drugs with CAMs

Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources. Score Weight Final Score Includes all assignment requirements, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly with details and examples where appropriate. Displays complete understanding of critical concepts. 90% 0,00 Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources. 10% 0,00 Content Score Writing Deduction Rubric Grammar & Punctuation Spelling Introductory Emergent Practiced Proficient/Mastered 0-1 2 3 4 Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion. A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation. There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear.

There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or runon sentences. The overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult. Many typos, misspelled The many misspelled words words, or the use of and incorrect words choices incorrect words making significantly interfere with the understanding difficult in a readability. few places. Paper has some good information or research, but it does not follow assignment Order of Ideas & Length Requirement directions and is lacking in overall organization and content. APA Feedback: There is some attempt at APA formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear. 80 0 Score Weight Final Score 4 35% 1,40 A few misspelled words normally Some misspelled words or caught by spellcheckers are the misuse of words such as present but do not significantly confusing then/than. interfere with the overall However, intent is still clear. readability of the paper. 4 35% 1,40 The order of information is confusing in several places and this organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper. However, the paper has a generally discernible purpose and follows assignment directions overall. The order of information is confusing in a few places and the lack of organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper in a minor way. The overall order of the information is clear and contributes to the meaning of assignment. Prescribed Drugs with CAMs

There is one paragraph or a sentence or two that are out of place or other minor organizational issues. A few sentences may be long and hard to understand. Meets length requirements. 4 20% 0,80 This is an attempt use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings. Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e. Websites listed as in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least one place. Authorship is generally clear. There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear.

There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. 4 10% 0,40 Writing Deduction 0,00 Final Score 0,00 Percentage 0,00% Assignment/Project Rubric Case Study: MN553 Advanced Pharmacology Unit 9 Case Study “Prescribed Drugs with CAMs” Student Name Date of Submission This paper addresses a pharmacological management plan for Mr. NX, including consideration of possible contraindications for CAMs, prescriptive, and non-prescriptive recommendations for management of acute pain and other ongoing disease processes, followed by evaluation strategies. Pharmacological Management Plan CAMs Contraindicated with Current Prescriptions CAMs Contraindicated with Diagnoses Prescription for Back Pain Changes in Prescribed Drugs Follow-Up Evaluations Time-Frame Strategies for Evaluating Side/Adverse Effects Strategies for Evaluating Effectiveness References (examples) Romm, A. (2011).

Overprescribing of antibiotics for children’s upper respiratory infections. Alternative options to consider. Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 17(6), 306–309. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.lib.kaplan.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2011411466&si te=eds-live Singh, J. A., Furst, D. E., Bharat, A., Curtis, J. R., Kavanaugh, A. F., Kremer, J. M.,…Saag, K. G. (2012). Update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Research and Quality, National Guideline Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=36892&search=rheumatoid+arthritis …
Prescribed Drugs with CAMs