Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial
Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial
find three different health care articles that use quantitative research. Complete an article analysis for each using the “Article Analysis 1” template (see attachment)
Refer to the “Patient Preference and Satisfaction in Hospital-at-Home and Usual Hospital Care for COPD Exacerbations: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial,” (see attachment) in conjunction with the “Article Analysis Example 1,” for an example of an article analysis.
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Patient satisfaction with the care they receive has been the subject of many quantitative and qualitative studies. In order to be more specific in the evaluation of hospital-at- home in comparison to usual hospital care we used deductive content analysis for the responses to the first part of the questionnaire which contained the two open-end questions (Graneheim and Lundman, 2004; Elo and Kyngas, 2008). Deductive content analysis is based on previous theories or models and therefore allows to go beyond general findings which would have been the focus of an inductive analysis. Sofaer and Firminger (2005) have identified seven categories on which patients base the definition of quality of health care on. These categories are namely patient-centred care; access; communication and information; courtesy and emotional support; technical quality; efficiency of care/ organisation; and structure and facilities. Responses to the two open-end questions were reviewed and then coded according to these seven categories. CU performed the first coding and CPvS checked these codings. Discrepancies were discussed between the two coders. For each of the categories the most named aspects are described and illustrated with authentic citations.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.