Task: Abdominal Pain Nursing Discussion

DQ1 (300) Differentiate between the appearances of skin lesions in relation to cancerous versus noncancerous. DQ2 (300) A patient presents with abdominal discomfort to the point of being in the fetal position. What questions need to be asked of this patient? What examination techniques would you perform for this patient? Reflection Complete a written reflection (250-350 words) on what you learned during this topic. Include the following in your reflection, considered through the lens of a nurse educator. 1. Think about an experience you have encountered when viewing or completing the particular assessment. 2. Describe the steps you took when completing this particular assessment.

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

3. Discuss difficulties that could potentially arise or specific questions relate d to completing this type of assessment. 4. Include illustrative examples of potential strategies used to overcome the difficulties encountered when completing the particular assessment. 5. Describe how the Christian worldview and compassion for all play a role in this type of assessment. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Criteria Description Reflection Experience

5. Target 3.5 points A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail. 4. Acceptable 3.22 points A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is complete and includes supporting detail. 3. Approaching 3.08 points A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is included but lacks supporting detail. 2. Insufficient 2.8 points A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is not included. Difficulties 3.5 points Criteria Description Difficulties 5. Target 3.5 points A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail. 4. Acceptable 3.22 points A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is complete and includes supporting detail.

3. Approaching 3.08 points A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is included but lacks supporting detail. 2. Insufficient 2.8 points A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is not included. Christian Worldview 1.5 points Criteria Description Christian Worldview 5. Target 1.5 points A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail. 4. Acceptable 1.38 points A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is complete and includes supporting detail. 3. Approaching 1.32 points A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is included but lacks supporting detail. 2. Insufficient 1.2 points A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is incomplete or incorrect. 1.

Unsatisfactory 0 points A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is not included. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 0.5 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5. Target 0.5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. Acceptable 0.46 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. 3. Approaching 0.44 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. 2. Insufficient 0.4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 0.5 points Criteria Description Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5. Target 0.5 points All format elements are correct. 4. Acceptable 0.46 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. 3. Approaching 0.44 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 2. Insufficient 0.4 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources 0.5 points Criteria Description Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. Target 0.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 4. Acceptable 0.46 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 3. Approaching 0.44 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 2. Insufficient 0.4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Sources are not documented.

Task: Abdominal Pain Nursing Discussion