Task: Collaboration in Nursing Discussion

Be sure to apply concepts from the readings and research from Yoder-Wise book. You must cite (with reference) at least one source: your textbook, scholarly resources, or ATI textbook (no blogs, Wiki, or other school of nursing website) in current APA Style

ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Discussion Board Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Initial Responses

view longer description

18 to >16.02 pts

The initial post applies course content sufficiently by expanding on the main points of the prompt; responses exhibit critical thinking and analysis.

16.02 to >13.5 pts

Content knowledge is exhibited by identification of the main topics; there is some evidence of critical thinking and analysis, but responses may be insufficient or lacking in detail.

13.5 to >10.62 pts

Understanding of content knowledge is poorly exhibited and insufficient in critical thinking, analysis, and detail. Some main discussion topics are not covered or significantly digress from the topic at hand.

10.62 to >0 pts

Initial response is missing or provides no indication of understanding. Main topics are not covered.

/ 18 pts

Reponses to Peers

view longer description

16 to >14.24 pts

Replies to peers are well developed and insightful, and provide an opportunity for response. Responses promote a discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making meaningful connections with course content, asking meaningful questions, or challenging viewpoints.

14.24 to >12 pts

Replies to peers are mostly developed and provide an opportunity for response. Responses contribute to the discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making connections with course content, or asking questions.

12 to >9.44 pts

Some replies to peers are missing or poorly developed and provide little or no opportunity for response. Responses do little to contribute to the discussion.

9.44 to >0 pts

No responses to peers are present AND/OR one word responses are provided.

/ 16 pts

Mechanics

view longer description

2 to >1.78 pts

Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately referenced and cited in current APA style when applicable.

1.78 to >1.5 pts

Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA style.

1.5 to >1.18 pts