Treatment Of Neurocognitive Disorders DQ Week 8
Treatment Of Neurocognitive Disorders DQ Week 8
By Day 5 of Week 7, your Instructor will have assigned you a neurocognitive disorder, which will be the focus for your initial post for this Discussion.
Assigned Disorder: Vascular Neurocognitive Disorder
Post:
Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned neurocognitive disorder.
Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned neurocognitive disorder.
Identify the risks of different types of therapy and explain how the benefits of the therapy that might be achieved might outweigh the risks.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years In APA Format Including an introduction and conclusion
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
* Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
* Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
* Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addresed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
* Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references
Name: NRNP_6670_Week8_Discussion_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
Treatment Of Neurocognitive Disorders DQ Week 8
1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 2/4
OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4 (4%) – 5 (5%) *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 3/4
OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
First Reponse: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 4/4