Treatment Of Substance-Related And Addictive Disorders Wk 4
Treatment Of Substance-Related And Addictive Disorders Wk 4
Assigned substance-related and addictive disorder: Alcohol-Related Disorders
Post:
Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned substance-related and addictive disorder.
Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned substance-related and addictive disorder.
Describe clinical features that you would expect to observe in a client that may have the substance-related and addictive disorder you were assigned. Align the clinical features with the DSM-5 criteria.
Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resources.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years In APA Format, Including introduction and conclusion.
ORDER CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
* Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) *is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discussion question(s) *is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
* Responds to most of the discussion question(s) *is somewhat re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
* Responds to some of the discussion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addressed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
* Does not respond to the discussion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references Treatment Of Substance-Related And Addictive Disorders Wk 4
Name: NRNP_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 2/4
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
*Written somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting errors
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * response may not be on topic, lacks depth
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 3/4
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
First Reponse: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * response may not be on topic, lacks depth
12/21/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 4/4
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Pro�cient Performance
Room for Improvement
Second Reponse: Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
Second Reponse: Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation
Total Points: 100