NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

Permalink: https://nursingessaygurus.com/nr601-week-5-case-study-mr-w/

Week 5: Case Study Assignment
Due Saturday by 11:59pm Points 160

THE FOLLOWING PAPER COMES WITH A CASE STUDY THAT WILL ADDED BELOW AND IT ALSO COMES WITH A TEMPLATE THAT MUST BE USED. NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

CASE STUDY IS AS FOLLOWS:

Mr. W, a 63-year-old Cuban male, presents to the office for his annual exam. He reports that lately he has been very fatigued and just does not seem to have any energy. This has been occurring for 3 months. He complains that he seems like he cannot get enough to drink. He also is having nocturia 2-3 times per night. He has gained approximately 10 lbs. over the last year. He joined a gym and forces himself to go twice a week, where he walks on the treadmill at least 30 minutes but has not lost any weight, in fact he has gained 5 pounds. He does not understand what he is doing wrong. He states that exercise seems to make him even more hungry and thirsty, which is not helping his weight loss. He wants to get a complete physical and to discuss why he is so tired and get some weight loss advice. Current medications: Tylenol 500 mg 2 tabs daily for knee pain. Daily multivitamin.

PMH: Has left knee arthritis. Had chick pox and mumps as a child. Vaccinations up to date. FH: parents deceased due to CAD, 3 children alive, well. + two siblings. Both siblings with CAD. Sister w/ breast cancer.SH: owns a restaurant. Married. No tobacco history, 1-2 glasses wine on weekends. No illicit drug use. Allergies: NKDA, allergic to cats and pollen. No latex allergy Vital signs: BP 129/80; pulse 76, regular; respiration 16, regular Height 5’2.5”, weight 185 pounds General: obese male in no acute distress. Alert, oriented and cooperative. Skin: warm dry and intact. No lesions noted. HEENT: head normocephalic. Hair thick and distribution throughout scalp. Eyes without exudate, sclera white. Wears contacts. Tympanic membranes gray and intact with light reflex noted. Pinna and tragus nontender. Nares patent without exudate. Oropharynx moist without erythema. Teeth in good repair, no cavities noted. Neck supple. Anterior cervical lymph nontender to palpation. No lymphadenopathy. Thyroid midline, small and firm without palpable masses.

CV: S1 and S2 RRR without murmurs or rubs. Lungs: Clear to auscultation bilaterally, respirations unlabored. Abdomen: soft, round, nontender with positive bowel sounds present; no organomegaly; no abdominal bruits. No CVAT. Labwork: CBC: WBC 6,000/mm3
Hgb 12.5 gm/dl Hct 41% RBC 4.6 million MCV 88 fl MCHC 34 g/dl RDW 13.8% UA: pH 5, SpGr 1.013, Leukocyte esterase negative,Nitrites negative, Glucose 1+; Protein: Small; Ketones: NegativeCMP: Sodium 139 Potassium 4.3 Chloride 100 CO2 29 Glucose 95 BUN 12 Creatinine 0.7 GFR est non-AA 92 mL/min/1.73 GFR est AA 101 mL/min/1.73 Calcium 9.5 Total protein 7.6 Bilirubin, total 0.6 Alkaline phosphatase 72
AST 25 ALT 29 Anion gap 8.10 Bun/Creat 17.7 Hemoglobin A1C: 6.9 % TSH: 2.35, Free T 4 0.7 Lipid Panel: TC 230 mg/dl, LDL 144 mg/dl; VLDL 36 mg/dl; HDL 38mg/dl, Triglycerides 232 EKG: normal sinus rhythmAST 25 ALT 29 Anion gap 8.10 Bun/Creat 17.7 Hemoglobin A1C: 6.9 % TSH: 2.35, Free T 4 0.7 Lipid Panel: TC 230 mg/dl, LDL 144 mg/dl; VLDL 36 mg/dl; HDL 38mg/dl, Triglycerides 232 EKG: normal sinus rhythm. NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

THIS IS THE TEMPLATE THAT NEEDS TO BE USED:

Title page per APA format

This assignment template serves as a paper template to develop the week 5 case study and may not be all inclusive. You must also refer to the assignment rubric for specific requirements for this assignment. Your paper is graded to the rubric requirements.

*Please make sure that you are following APA guidelines as you will be graded on APA.

Make sure your paper meets APA Criteria

The introductory paragraph is written here. Remember to remove all instructions from your paper. These are in red ink. AssessmentPrimary Diagnosis diagnosis (ICD10 code) pathophysiologyA brief pathophysiology statement which is no longer that two sentences, paraphrased and includes common signs and symptoms of the diagnosis. Includes citation to an approved source (author, year).Review the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document. This applies to all sections of this paper. pertinent positive findingsincludes citation to an approved source (author, year).Review the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study documents. This applies to all sections of this paper. pertinent negative findingsincludes citation to an approved source (author, year).Review the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study documents. This applies to all sections of this paper. rationale for the diagnosisincludes a brief 1-2 sentence statement, which links the subjective and objective case study findings including provided lab data and interpretation of the labs. Include a statement linking those lab results to your ADA guideline reference. Includes citation to the ADA guideline used to determine this diagnosis. Secondary Diagnosis diagnosis (ICD10 code)*You can have more than one secondary diagnosis. A minimum is required. Secondary diagnoses are additional diagnoses you have identified from the exam, lab findings today or the PMH*Pathophysiology A brief pathophysiology statement which is no longer that two sentences, paraphrased and includes common signs and symptoms of the diagnosis (author, year).pertinent positive findings as explained above (author, year).
3 pertinent negative findings as explained above (author, year).rationale for the diagnosis-includes a brief 1-2 sentence statement, which links the subjective and objective findings including any provided lab data and interpretation of the diagnostic testing. The rationale includes a citation to a scholarly reference (author, year)

Plan Diagnostics Lab test (#1) (each lab/diagnostic test is listed individually with rationale to follow AND is linked to a diagnosis listed in the assessment section of the paper. Include the timeframe of when the lab is to be drawn. *This is labs or tests you will order in the future, not an explanation of the labs that have already been completed.*rationale: each rationale contains the EBP statement supporting the necessity of the test and includes the name of the diagnosis which is listed in the assessment section.* If this diagnosis is not listed in the assessment section then it must be added to order the diagnostic testing*. Includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document which supports not only the test but the timing of the lab draw. Lab test (#2) includes same criteria. Do the same for each lab you want to order. Medications *each medication is linked to a diagnosis listed in the assessment section of the paper AND is listed individually with rationale, including the required OTC*Medication (#1) – written in prescription format (see NR 601 Resources) Rationale.The rationale for each medication includes the diagnosis which is listed in the assessment section and contains the EBP statement supporting the necessity of the medication. If this diagnosis is not listed in the assessment section, then it must be added to include any medication. Includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document.Medication (#2) includes same criteria. Do the same for each medication listed
4Educationsection includes personalized detailed education on all five (5) subcategories: diagnosis, each medication purpose and side effects, diet, personalized appropriate exercise recommendations and warning sign for diagnosis and medications if applicable. You do not need an introduction paragraph. All education steps are linked to a listed diagnosis, paraphrased, and include a paraphrased EBP rationale. If this diagnosis is not listed in the assessment section, then it must be added to include the education content here. Each education section includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study documentDiagnoses.Includes personalized detailed education for each diagnosis listed in the assessment section. This includes specific information for this particular client. Education includes a citation to an appropriate reference. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.Medications.includes personalized detailed education for each medication listed in the medication section. Each medication is listed and then explained. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.

Diet.includes personalized detailed education for dietary recommendations as determined by the listed diagnoses in the assessment section. This includes specific dietary information. A referral to cover this requirement is not sufficient. If weight loss is recommended, then specific weight loss targets must be included. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.Exercise.includes personalized detailed education for exercise recommendations as determined by the listed diagnoses in the assessment section. List specific exercises that are appropriate for this patient. No 4Educationsection includes personalized detailed education on all five (5) subcategories: diagnosis, each medication purpose and side effects, diet, personalized appropriate exercise recommendations and warning sign for diagnosis and medications if applicable. You do not need an introduction paragraph. All education steps are linked to a listed diagnosis, paraphrased, and include a paraphrased EBP rationale. If this diagnosis is not listed in the assessment section, then it must be added to include the education content here. Each education section includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study documentDiagnoses.Includes personalized detailed education for each diagnosis listed in the assessment section. This includes specific information for this particular client. Education includes a citation to an appropriate reference. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.Medications.includes personalized detailed education for each medication listed in the medication section. Each medication is listed and then explained. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference. NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

Diet.includes personalized detailed education for dietary recommendations as determined by the listed diagnoses in the assessment section. This includes specific dietary information. A referral to cover this requirement is not sufficient. If weight loss is recommended, then specific weight loss targets must be included. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.Exercise.includes personalized detailed education for exercise recommendations as determined by the listed diagnoses in the assessment section. List specific exercises that are appropriate for this patient. No
5listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference. Warning Signs for diagnoses and mediationsincludes personalized detailed education as determined by the listed diagnoses and medications. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.ReferralSpecialty practice or service (each referral is linked to a diagnosis listed in the assessment section of the paper and is listed individually with rationale to follow) rationale: each rationale contains the EBP statement supporting the necessity of the referral and includes the name of the diagnosis which is listed in the assessment section. Includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document. Any referrals for the listed primary diagnosis must be cited from the chosen ADA guideline.Referral(#2) includes same criteria. Do the same for each referral Follow upFollow up includes a specific time frame (1week, 1 month) , not a time range, to return to PCP office for next scheduled appointment. Includes EBP rationale with in text citation. Refer to the rubric for full section requirements. Follow up does not include other upcoming plans. Diagnostics and referrals are discussed within that section above. Assessment of comorbidities See rubric for section requirements. Medication CostSee rubric for section requirements.
6Conclusion A summary paragraph no more than 5 sentences

Purpose
The purpose of this case study assignment is to :

Analyze provided subjective and objective information to diagnose and develop a management plan for the selected case study patient.
Apply national diabetes guidelines to a case study patient.
Apply national guidelines to develop a management plan for all identified secondary diagnosis(es).
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Select appropriate health promotion and disease prevention strategies for patients with or at risk for a glucose metabolism disorder (WO5.1) (CO1,2,3,4,5)
Demonstrate competence in the evaluation and management of patients with glucose metabolism disorders
Develop a management plan for the case study patient based on identified primary, secondary and differential diagnoses.
Apply polypharmacy knowledge to medication reconciliation for selected case study patient. NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W
Due Date:

This assignment is submitted through Turn It In (TII).* Students are allowed two opportunities to submit. The first Turn It In submission allows the student to view the Turn It In Score and edit the assignment if necessary. The second submission is considered the final submission and will be graded. Any further Turn IT In submissions will not be considered for grading.

*due to the amount of common case study content it is not unusual that the TII may exceed 25%. It is the original work, such as rationale statements and treatment plans that are evaluated for similarity by the faculty.

Total Points Possible: 160

Requirements:
The assignment is a paper, which is to be written in APA format using the provided assignment template. The paper shall not exceed 10 pages, excluding title page and references.

NR601 _week 5 case study paper template_Nov 20.docx download

Case Study Patient – March 2020 download

Review the provided patient visit information. You are provided with the subjective and objective exam findings. As the provider, you are to diagnose the case study patient and develop the management plan for this case study patient.  Keep in mind this is a complex patient who has more than one diagnosis, which is common in primary care.

Use the provided case study template for your paper. Review the APA Manual to adhere to APA formatting.

Introduction: briefly discuss the purpose of this paper.  (no more than 5 sentences)

Assessment: review the provided case study information.

Identify the primary and secondary diagnosis for the patient. Each diagnosis will include the following information:

ICD 10 code.
A brief pathophysiology statement which is no longer that two sentences, paraphrased and includes common signs and symptoms of the diagnosis and proper citation.
The patient’s pertinent positive and negative findings, including a brief 1-2 sentence statement, which links the subjective and objective findings (including lab data and interpretation).
An evidence-based rationale statement, which summarizes why the diagnosis was chosen.
Do not include quotes, paraphrase all scholarly information and provide an in-text citation to your scholarly reference. Use the Reference Guidelines document for information on scholarly references.
Plan: (there are five (5) sections to the management plan)

Diagnostics. List all labs and diagnostic test you would like to order. Each test includes a rationale statement following the listed lab, which includes the diagnosis requiring the test, the purpose of the test and how the test results will contribute to your management plan. Each rationale statement is cited.  Include all future follow up labs for each listed diagnosis.
Medications: Each medication is listed in prescription format. Each prescribed and OTC medication is linked to a specific diagnosis and includes a paraphrased EBP rationale for prescribing.   NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W
Education: section includes personalized detailed education on all five (5) subcategories: diagnosis, each medication purpose and side effects, diet, personalized appropriate exercise recommendations and warning sign for diagnosis and medications if applicable. All education steps are linked to a diagnosis, paraphrased, and include a paraphrased EBP rationale. Review the NR601 Clinical SOAP note guideline for more detailed information.
Referrals: any recommended referrals are appropriate to the patient diagnosis and current condition, is linked to a specific diagnosis and includes a paraphrased EBP rationale with in text citation. Review the ADA guidelines for specific follow up recommendations.
Follow up: Follow up includes a specific time, not a time range, to return to PCP office for next scheduled appointment. Includes EBP rationale with in text citation.
Assessment of Comorbidities: in this section students will review the ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes (the guidelines) Assessment of Comorbidities section on comorbidities subsection and choose one listed comorbidity.  Students will discuss the significance of and the relationship between the patient’s primary diagnosis and the chosen comorbidity, explaining how one diagnosis affects the other diagnosis.  Any recommended screening, diagnostic testing, and referrals are also included.

Medication costs: in this section students will research the costs of all prescribed and OTC monthly medications that you have prescribed and that the patient is currently taking that you would like to continue.  Students may use Good Rx, Epocrates or another resource (students may use local pharmacy websites) which provides medication costs. Students will list each medication, the monthly cost of the medication and the reference source. Students will calculate the monthly cost of the case study patient’s prescribed and OTC medications and provide the total costs of the month’s medications. Reflect on the monthly cost of the medications prescribed. Discuss if prescriptions were adjusted due to cost. Discuss if will you use medication pricing resources in future practice.  NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

Description

Grammar, Syntax, APA

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one error. All referenced information is cited, “according to” is not used. All cited information is paraphrased, no quotes are included in the paper.

Organization

Paper is developed in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence.

Provided assignment template is used to develop the paper.  The rationale length does not exceed template directions. The paper length does not exceed 10 pages, excluding title page and references.  NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

Total FORMAT Points= [16 pts]

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL=160 points

Rubric
NR601_Week 5 Case Study _Nov19
NR601_Week 5 Case Study _Nov19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 144 Points
Assessment of primary diagnosis

1)the ICD10 code is listed in parentheses next to diagnosis.

2) Diagnosis is consistent with the cited guideline recommendations or scholarly reference

3) Includes a one to two sentence paraphrased pathophysiology statement.

4) The rationale statement includes pertinent positive and negative subjective and objective findings from the history and physical exam, which links this diagnosis to your patient. Pertinent lab results are included and interpreted within the rationale statement

(4 required elements)
24 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
22 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
20 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
12 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing  OR Section includes information that does not pertain to the case study patient such as pregnancy information or gender information that does not pertain to the case study patient’s listed gender or age.
24 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment of secondary diagnosis (es)
1) the ICD10 code is listed in parentheses next to diagnosis.

2) Diagnosis is consistent with the cited guideline recommendations or scholarly reference

3) includes a one to two sentence paraphrased pathophysiology statement.

(4 required elements)
16 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
14 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
13 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
8 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing  OR Section includes information that does not pertain to the case study patient such as pregnancy information or gender information that does not pertain to the case study patient’s listed gender or age.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-Based Practice
National guidelines are used to support all diagnoses and develop the plan.  NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

1) The American Diabetes Association Standards and Medical Care in Diabetes-2019 or later, (or article related to 2019 or later Guidelines) are used to support the primary diagnosis and develop the plan.

2) Every diagnosis rationale must include an in text citation to a scholarly reference as listed in the Reference Guidelines document.

3) Each action step or order within all plan sections includes an in text citation to an appropriate reference as listed in the Reference Guidelines document.

4) Reference interpretation is accurate

(4 required elements)
40 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
36 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
33 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
20 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan: Diagnostics
1) All ordered diagnostic test  are presented individually

2) All ordered diagnostics tests are linked to a diagnosis listed in the assessment section

3) All ordered tests include a paraphrased EBP rationale with citation and include date when test should be performed (ie: today, 1 week, 1 month)

4) Plans are consistent with the cited guideline recommendations or scholarly reference

(4 required elements)
8 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
6 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan: Medications
Each  listed medication

1) is linked to a diagnosis listed within the assessment section or a current patent medication

2) an OTC medication is included in recommended medications

3) includes a paraphrased EBP rationale for prescribing

4) written in prescription format

( 4 required elements)
8 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
6 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan: Education
This section is written exactly how you would discuss the education to the patient. Use vocabulary which the patient can understand.  NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

1) All education steps are linked to a diagnosis which was listed in the assessment section, paraphrased, and includes an EBP rationale.

2) Section includes personalized detailed education on diagnoses, medications, diet, exercise and warning signs.

3) Personalized diet and exercise recommendations which include specific instructions and are appropriate for the case study patient.

4) Plans are consistent with the cited guideline recommendations or scholarly reference

( 4 required elements)
8 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
6 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan: Referral
1) each referral is linked to a specific diagnosis which was listed in the assessment section.

2) All referrals related to the primary diagnosis are obtained from the ADA guidelines.

3) each referral includes a paraphrased EBP rationale.

4) Referral plans are consistent with the cited guideline recommendations or scholarly reference

( 4 required elements)
8 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
6 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan: Follow-Up
1) Includes a specific time frame or date to return to PCP office.  A time range is not acceptable (i.e. 2-4 weeks)

2) Includes EBP rationale with in text citation for chosen follow up date

3) Plans are EBP and consistent with the cited guideline recommendations.

4) Only follow up information is listed in this section.  NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W

( 4 required elements)
8 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
6 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment of comorbidities
1) Comordidity chosen was listed within the listed comorbidities from the Assessments of comorbidities subsection*

2) Discussed significance of and the relationship between primary diagnosis and chosen comorbidity.

3) Explain how one diagnosis affects the other diagnosis in no more than 3-5 sentences.

4) Included any recommended screening, diagnostic testing, and referrals in no more that 2-3 sentences.

* the chosen comorbidity cannot be any secondary diagnosis already discussed in your paper’s assessment section

( 4 required elements)
16 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
14 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
13 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
8 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing  OR the chosen comorbidity is also a secondary diagnosis already discussed within the paper’s  assessment section
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication Costs
All monthly medication costs are calculated

1 )All medications including current medications and OTCs are included.

2) Each medication cost is calculated individually

3) a total cost for the month’s medication is calculated

4) Summary/reflection statement is included regarding medication costs and any medications changes based on cost or polypharmacy concerns

( 4 required elements)
8 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
6 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 16 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.

1) All referenced information is cited at the end of the phrase or sentence

2) All cited information is paraphrased, no quotes are included

3) “according to” or “per” is not used when citing a scholarly source
8 pts
Excellent
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.     Three required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.     Three required elements are present
6 pts
Satisfactory
Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.”    1 required element is missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W
Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.     OR   2 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Post contains ten or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.   OR   3 required element are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
Paper is developed in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence

1) Provided assignment template is used to develop paper

2) Rationale length does not exceed template directions.

3) All required sections are included within the assignment

4) The paper length does not exceed 10 pages. (not including title page and references)
8 pts
Excellent
All 4 required elements are present
7 pts
V. Good
1 required element is missing
6 pts
Satisfactory
2 required elements are missing
4 pts
Needs Improvement
3 required elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 required elements are missing
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
Manual Deductions
0 pts
Manual Deductions
0 pts
Total Points: 160

I WOULD LIKE TO ATTACH THE TEMPLATES BUT THIS SPOT DOESNT LET ME PERHAPS i CAN SEND IT TO THE WRITER NR601 Week 5 Case Study Mr W