Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.
Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.
To Prepare: Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
- Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
- Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
- Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)- Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:
- Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
- How was the success of the program or policy measured?
- How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
- How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
- At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
- What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
- What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
- What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
- Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
- Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
- Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.
Please use template that is provided. Look over the rubric. APA format. 2-3 pages max.
Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric Grid View EXIT List View Program/Policy Evaluation Based on the program or policy evaluation you seelcted, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: · Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. · How was the success of the program or policy measured? · How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
· At what point in time in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations · What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? · What speci!c information on unintended consequences was identi!ed? · What stakeholders were identi!ed in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would bene!t the most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be speci!c and provide examples. · Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
· Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? · Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation. Excellent Good Fair Poor 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) Response clearly and accurately describes in detail the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete.
Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete. Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy.
Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate. Response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured. Response clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy. Response clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted. Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, “ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused-neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
45 (45%) – 50 (50%) 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Response clearly and accurately identi!es the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response accurately identi!es the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response vaguely or inaccurately identi!es the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Identi!cation of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of speci!c information on outcomes and unintended consequences identi!ed through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete. Explanation of speci!c information on outcomes and unitended consequences identi!ed through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail speci!c information on outcomes and unintended consequences identi!ed through the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would bene!t most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted. Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Response explains in detail speci!c information on outcomes and unintended consequences identi!ed through the program or policy evaluation. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response explains who would bene!t most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of who would bene!t most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of who would bene!t most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity. Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or o# topic. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric EXIT Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template Use this document to complete the Module 5 Assessment Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes © 2020 Walden University 1 How was the success of the program or policy measured? Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? © 2020 Walden University 2 At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified? © 2020 Walden University 3 What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? © 2020 Walden University 4 Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work?
Why or why not? Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation. © 2020 Walden University 5 General Notes/Comments © 2020 Walden University 6 … Policy and Advocacy for improving population health Discussion